These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 752955)
1. [Myocardial infarct without EKG signs of necrosis]. Zecević D; Aleksić N; Petrić R Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1978; 106(7-8):743-53. PubMed ID: 752955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Central venous pressure changes in patients with myocardial infarct in relation to the electrocardiographic location of necrosis]. Rumiński W; Widomska-Czekajska T; Kutarski A Wiad Lek; 1982 May; 35(5):275-81. PubMed ID: 7113214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Use of the precordial dotted map for forecasting the extension of necrosis in acute myocardial infarct]. Rossi P; Rognoni G; Minella M Boll Soc Ital Cardiol; 1981; 26(10):1077-8. PubMed ID: 7349120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Diagnosis of successive myocardial infarction based on ECG in patients with a history of myocardial infarction in the past]. Kolber-Postepska B; Miturzyńska-Stryjecka H; Jach A; Bednarzewski J Pol Tyg Lek; 1985 Nov; 40(44):1229-31. PubMed ID: 4088940 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Anatomo-electrocardiographic comparison in myocardial infarct. I. Anterior myocardial infarct]. Montemurro G; Tommaselli A; Narbone NB Boll Soc Ital Cardiol; 1968; 13(3):316-21. PubMed ID: 5744516 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Precordial mapping and morphometric indices of the necrotic area in myocardial infarct in chronic bronchitis patients]. Ionov VA Ter Arkh; 1985; 57(3):141-4. PubMed ID: 4002157 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [The X, Y and Z orthogonal leads of the Frank vectorial system. An alternative to the precordial mapping of the ST segment in evaluation of ischemic damage in acute myocardial infarct]. Cantelli I; Bracchetti D Minerva Cardioangiol; 1980 Jun; 28(6):419-27. PubMed ID: 7242927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Anatomo-electrocardiographic comparison in myocardial infarct. II. Apical infarction]. Montemurro G; Tommaselli A; Narbone NB Boll Soc Ital Cardiol; 1968; 13(3):322-7. PubMed ID: 5744517 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinical methods of evaluating infarct size and its anatomic correlations. Study carried out in 193 cases. I. Evaluation of infarct size using a QRS score. Electro-anatomic correlations]. Martins C; Perdigão C; Andrade A; Bastos C; Monteiro J; Ramalhinho V; Ribeiro C Rev Port Cardiol; 1988; 7(4):401-8. PubMed ID: 3273442 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Anatomo-electrocardiographic comparison in myocardial infarct. V. Multiple infarcts]. Montemurro G; Tommaselli A; Narbone NB Boll Soc Ital Cardiol; 1968; 13(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 5744520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Recommendations for the evaluation and interpretation of electrocardiograms of adolescents and adults. Brief programmed course. 12. Partial program IV: Ischemia and infarct diagnosis. 2: Detection and exclusion of infarct signs (A)]. Assmann I; Mücke D; Pries W; Fiehring H; Werner G; Bartel J Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1985; 79(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 3984395 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Anatomo-electrocardiographic comparison in myocardial infarct. IV. Infarcts of the posterior wall]. Montemurro G; Tommaselli A; Narbone NB Boll Soc Ital Cardiol; 1968; 13(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 5744519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Natural evolution of the ischemic lesion and necrotic area evaluated with thoracic electro-maps in acute myocardial infarct]. Previtali M; Marangoni E; Medici A; Chimienti M; De Servi S; Salerno JA; Bobba P Boll Soc Ital Cardiol; 1981; 26(10):1099-101. PubMed ID: 7349126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of the use of ultrasonic cardiac scanning for the diagnosis of myocardial infarct and unstable stenocardia]. Olesin AI Ter Arkh; 1986; 58(12):77-80. PubMed ID: 3547755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Hemodynamic exploration in the acute stage of myocardial infarct. 3. Site of necrosis and ventricular functions]. Motté G; Perrault M; Lorente P; Coumel P; Gourgon R; Bouvrain Y Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1971 Oct; 64(10):1377-89. PubMed ID: 5001528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Anatomo-electrographic comparison in myocardial infarct. 3. Infarcts of the lateral wall]. Montemurro G; Tommaselli A; Narbone NB Boll Soc Ital Cardiol; 1968; 13(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 5744518 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Value of the posterior derivations in the diagnosis of true posterior participation in acute myocardial infarct]. Daniel Riesco C; San José Garagarza JM; Domenech Delgado JL; Prieto Solis JA; Gutiérrez Morlote J Rev Clin Esp; 1979 Oct; 155(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 531308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of ischemic damage in acute myocardial infarct, using the Frank orthogonal leads]. Cantelli I; Lombardi G; Patroncini A; Bracchetti D Boll Soc Ital Cardiol; 1980; 25(5):521-4. PubMed ID: 7284157 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Determination of the size of the myocardial infarct by electrocardiographic methods]. Orlov VN; Zhukova NA; Uranov VN Ter Arkh; 1987; 59(10):121-3. PubMed ID: 3324372 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Serial determinations of MB CPK activity in the evaluation of the severity of acute myocardial infarct]. Vinogradov AV; Arutiunov GP; Zhuravleva IA; Gel'fand IN; Kharlan GV Sov Med; 1981; (11):3-6. PubMed ID: 7336240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]