These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7530637)

  • 1. Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings.
    Pantev C; Bertrand O; Eulitz C; Verkindt C; Hampson S; Schuierer G; Elbert T
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Jan; 94(1):26-40. PubMed ID: 7530637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The auditory evoked magnetic fields to very high frequency tones.
    Fujioka T; Kakigi R; Gunji A; Takeshima Y
    Neuroscience; 2002; 112(2):367-81. PubMed ID: 12044454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human middle latency auditory evoked magnetic fields.
    Yoshiura T; Ueno S; Iramina K; Masuda K
    Brain Topogr; 1996; 8(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 8728421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Replicability of MEG and EEG measures of the auditory N1/N1m-response.
    Virtanen J; Ahveninen J; Ilmoniemi RJ; Näätänen R; Pekkonen E
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Apr; 108(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 9607518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity of EEG and MEG to the N1 and P2 auditory evoked responses modulated by spectral complexity of sounds.
    Shahin AJ; Roberts LE; Miller LM; McDonald KL; Alain C
    Brain Topogr; 2007; 20(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 17899352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of stimulus frequency and stimulation site on the N1m response of the human auditory cortex.
    Gabriel D; Veuillet E; Ragot R; Schwartz D; Ducorps A; Norena A; Durrant JD; Bonmartin A; Cotton F; Collet L
    Hear Res; 2004 Nov; 197(1-2):55-64. PubMed ID: 15504604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of center frequency and bandwidth on the auditory evoked magnetic field.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S; Matsuoka K
    Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 218(1-2):64-71. PubMed ID: 16797895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human auditory middle latency responses: influence of stimulus type and intensity.
    Borgmann C; Ross B; Draganova R; Pantev C
    Hear Res; 2001 Aug; 158(1-2):57-64. PubMed ID: 11506937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tonotopic organization of the sources of human auditory steady-state responses.
    Pantev C; Roberts LE; Elbert T; Ross B; Wienbruch C
    Hear Res; 1996 Nov; 101(1-2):62-74. PubMed ID: 8951433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual categorization of sound spectral envelopes reflected in auditory-evoked N1m.
    Mizuochi T; Yumoto M; Karino S; Itoh K; Yamakawa K; Kaga K
    Neuroreport; 2005 Apr; 16(6):555-8. PubMed ID: 15812306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. One set of sounds, two tonotopic maps: exploring auditory cortex with amplitude-modulated tones.
    Weisz N; Keil A; Wienbruch C; Hoffmeister S; Elbert T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jun; 115(6):1249-58. PubMed ID: 15134691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple bilaterally asymmetric cortical sources account for the auditory N1m component.
    Zouridakis G; Simos PG; Papanicolaou AC
    Brain Topogr; 1998; 10(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 9562539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tonotopic representation of missing fundamental complex sounds in the human auditory cortex.
    Fujioka T; Ross B; Okamoto H; Takeshima Y; Kakigi R; Pantev C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2003 Jul; 18(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 12887425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combined mapping of human auditory EEG and MEG responses.
    Huotilainen M; Winkler I; Alho K; Escera C; Virtanen J; Ilmoniemi RJ; Jääskeläinen IP; Pekkonen E; Näätänen R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Jul; 108(4):370-9. PubMed ID: 9714379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Change-related responses in the human auditory cortex: an MEG study.
    Yamashiro K; Inui K; Otsuru N; Kakigi R
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Jan; 48(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20525009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence for dissociation of spatial and nonspatial auditory information processing.
    Anourova I; Nikouline VV; Ilmoniemi RJ; Hotta J; Aronen HJ; Carlson S
    Neuroimage; 2001 Dec; 14(6):1268-77. PubMed ID: 11707083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tonotopic organization of human auditory cortex revealed by multi-channel SQUID system.
    Yamamoto T; Uemura T; Llinás R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 1604979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Application of simultaneous auditory evoked potentials and functional magnetic resonance recordings for examination of central auditory system--preliminary results].
    Milner R; Rusiniak M; Wolak T; Piatkowska-Janko E; Naumczyk P; Bogorodzki P; Senderski A; Ganc M; Skarzyński H
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2011; 65(3):171-83. PubMed ID: 21916216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tonotopic auditory cortex and the magnetoencephalographic (MEG) equivalent of the mismatch negativity.
    Tiitinen H; Alho K; Huotilainen M; Ilmoniemi RJ; Simola J; Näätänen R
    Psychophysiology; 1993 Sep; 30(5):537-40. PubMed ID: 8416081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Action-sound coincidences suppress evoked responses of the human auditory cortex in EEG and MEG.
    Horváth J; Maess B; Baess P; Tóth A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Sep; 24(9):1919-31. PubMed ID: 22360594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.