203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7531590)
1. Should we reconsider the indications for ileo-obturator node dissection with localized prostate cancer?
Sullivan LD; Rabbani F
Br J Urol; 1995 Jan; 75(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 7531590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: high incidence of lymph node metastasis.
Heidenreich A; Varga Z; Von Knobloch R
J Urol; 2002 Apr; 167(4):1681-6. PubMed ID: 11912387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Incidence of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of < or =10 ng/mL and biopsy Gleason score of < or =6, and their influence on PSA progression-free survival after radical prostatectomy.
Weckermann D; Goppelt M; Dorn R; Wawroschek F; Harzmann R
BJU Int; 2006 Jun; 97(6):1173-8. PubMed ID: 16686707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detecting lymph nodes metastasis in prostate cancer through extended vs. standard laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Arenas LF; Füllhase C; Boemans P; Fichtner J
Aktuelle Urol; 2010 Jan; 41 Suppl 1():S10-4. PubMed ID: 20094944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The extent of lymphadenectomy for pTXNO prostate cancer does not affect prostate cancer outcome in the prostate specific antigen era.
DiMarco DS; Zincke H; Sebo TJ; Slezak J; Bergstralh EJ; Blute ML
J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1121-5. PubMed ID: 15758719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Extended sentinel lymph node dissection in radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a study in the Kiel risk population].
Hautmann S; Beitz S; Naumann M; Lützen U; Seif C; Stübinger SH; van der Horst C; Braun PM; Leuschner I; Henze E; Jünemann KP
Urologe A; 2008 Mar; 47(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 18273596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Outcome after radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for untreated high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer].
Tsurusaki T; Yamasaki Y; Maruta S
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 May; 104(3):496-504. PubMed ID: 23819361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy before radical prostatectomy: who is unlikely to benefit?
Rabbani F; Sullivan LD; Goldenberg SL; Stothers L
Br J Urol; 1997 Feb; 79(2):221-5. PubMed ID: 9052474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Seminal vesicle biopsy and laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection: implications for patient selection in the radiotherapeutic management of prostate cancer.
Stock RG; Stone NN; Ianuzzi C; Unger P
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Nov; 33(4):815-21. PubMed ID: 7591888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of preoperative values to determine the need for lymphadenectomy in patients with prostate cancer and meticulous lymph node dissection.
Burkhard FC; Bader P; Schneider E; Markwalder R; Studer UE
Eur Urol; 2002 Aug; 42(2):84-90; discussion 90-2. PubMed ID: 12160577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Indications for pelvic lymphadenectomy in clinically localized prostate cancer].
Peneau M; Villers A; Molinié V; Theis D; Soulié M
Prog Urol; 2004 Jun; 14(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 15373168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictive value of the anatomical location of ultrasound-guided systematic sextant prostate biopsies for the nodal status of patients with localized prostate cancer.
Dunzinger M; Sega W; Madersbacher S; Schorn A
Eur Urol; 1997; 31(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 9129923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictors of Lymph Node Invasion in Patients with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Who Undergo Radical Prostatectomy and Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: The Role of Obesity.
Tafuri A; Rizzetto R; Amigoni N; Sebben M; Shakir A; Gozzo A; Odorizzi K; Gallina S; Bianchi A; Ornaghi P; Brunelli M; Migliorini F; Cerruto MA; Artibani W; Siracusano S; Antonelli A; Porcaro AB
Urol Int; 2021; 105(5-6):362-369. PubMed ID: 33059351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nondissection of pelvic lymph nodes does not influence the results of perineal radical prostatectomy in selected patients.
Salomon L; Hoznek A; Lefrère-Belda MA; Bellot J; Chopin DK; Abbou CC
Eur Urol; 2000 Mar; 37(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 10720855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgeon-led prostate cancer lymph node staging: pathological outcomes stratified by robot-assisted dissection templates and patient selection.
Altok M; Babaian K; Achim MF; Achim GC; Troncoso P; Matin SF; Chapin BF; Davis JW
BJU Int; 2018 Jul; 122(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 29446205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is a limited lymphadenectomy targeting obturator nodes alone an adequate procedure for Japanese men undergoing radical prostatectomy?
Miyake H; Sakai I; Harada K; Hara I; Eto H
Int J Urol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):739-44. PubMed ID: 16174048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the current incidence of nodal metastasis from prostate cancer.
Bundrick WS; Culkin DJ; Mata JA; Zitman RI; Venable DD
J Surg Oncol; 1993 Apr; 52(4):269-71. PubMed ID: 7682265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Per-operative frozen section examination of pelvic nodes is unnecessary for the majority of clinically localized prostate cancers in the prostate-specific antigen era.
Kakehi Y; Kamoto T; Okuno H; Terai A; Terachi T; Ogawa O
Int J Urol; 2000 Aug; 7(8):281-6. PubMed ID: 10976815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Topography of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended lymphadenectomy: results of a combined molecular and histopathologic mapping study.
Heck MM; Retz M; Bandur M; Souchay M; Vitzthum E; Weirich G; Mollenhauer M; Schuster T; Autenrieth M; Kübler H; Maurer T; Thalgott M; Herkommer K; Gschwend JE; Nawroth R
Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):222-9. PubMed ID: 23465520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Limited efficacy of preoperative computed tomographic scanning for the evaluation of lymph node metastasis in patients before radical prostatectomy.
Flanigan RC; McKay TC; Olson M; Shankey TV; Pyle J; Waters WB
Urology; 1996 Sep; 48(3):428-32. PubMed ID: 8804497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
