106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7531938)
1. Precision and accuracy of monocyte counting. Comparison of two hematology analyzers, the manual differential and flow cytometry.
Hübl W; Hauptlorenz S; Tlustos L; Jilch R; Fischer M; Bayer PM
Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Feb; 103(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 7531938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Peripheral blood monocyte counting: towards a new reference method.
Hübl W; Andert S; Erath A; Lapin A; Bayer PM
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1995 Nov; 33(11):839-45. PubMed ID: 8620061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Proposed reference method for peripheral-blood monocyte counting using fluorescence-labelled monoclonal antibodies.
Hübl W; Tlustos L; Erath A; Andert S; Bayer PM
Cytometry; 1996 Mar; 26(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 8809484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of automated basophil counting by using fluorescence-labelled monoclonal antibodies.
Hübl W; Andert S; Erath A; Streicher J; Bayer PM
J Clin Lab Anal; 1996; 10(4):177-83. PubMed ID: 8811460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of the reproducibility of automated monocyte counting using flow cytometry and monoclonal antibodies].
Vives Corrons JL; Besson I; Villamor N; Aymerich M; Marín JL; Jou JM
Sangre (Barc); 1994 Jun; 39(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 7940050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the monocyte counting by two automated haematology analysers compared with flow cytometry.
Grimaldi E; Carandente P; Scopacasa F; Romano MF; Pellegrino M; Bisogni R; De Caterina M
Clin Lab Haematol; 2005 Apr; 27(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 15784123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laboratory evaluation of the Abbott Cell DYN 3500 5-part differential.
Fournier M; Gireau A; Chretien MC; Ghevaert C; Boniface B; Goudemand J; Cosson A
Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Mar; 105(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 8602608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of cell counting and leukocyte differentiation in cerebrospinal fluid controls using hematology analyzers by the German Society for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine.
Kleine TO; Nebe CT; Löwer C; Lehmitz R; Geilenkeuser WJ; Kruse R; Dorn-Beineke A
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010 Jun; 48(6):839-48. PubMed ID: 20441472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two-centre evaluation of the Abbott CD3500 blood counter.
al-Ismail SA; Bond K; Carter AB; Grant D; Machin SJ; Patterson KG; Pearman KJ; Pollard YC; Popeck M
Clin Lab Haematol; 1995 Mar; 17(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 7621623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the Abbott Cell Dyn 3000 SL and the Coulter STKS hematology analyzers.
Stroop DM; Triplett RC; Perrotta G; Roberts LP; Schramm RC; Comer K; Miller-Canfield P; Schumacher HR
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 1994; 24(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 8048797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A field evaluation of the Coulter STKS.
Warner BA; Reardon DM
Am J Clin Pathol; 1991 Feb; 95(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 1899530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated leucocyte differentials in 292 patients with leucopenia: an evaluation of the Abbott CELL-DYN 3500 (CD3500) haematology analyser.
Burchert-Graeve M; Kock R
Clin Lab Haematol; 1996 Dec; 18(4):253-9. PubMed ID: 9054698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the classical manual pushed wedge films, with an improved automated method for making blood smears.
Benattar L; Flandrin G
Hematol Cell Ther; 1999 Nov; 41(5):211-5. PubMed ID: 10651121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determination of reticulocytes: three methods compared.
Siekmeier R; Bierlich A; Jaross W
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2000 Mar; 38(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 10905762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A parallel evaluation of four automated hematology analyzers.
Bentley SA; Johnson A; Bishop CA
Am J Clin Pathol; 1993 Dec; 100(6):626-32. PubMed ID: 8249909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative study of monocyte enumeration by flow cytometry: improved detection by combining monocyte-related antibodies with anti-CD163.
Zarev PV; Davis BH
Lab Hematol; 2004; 10(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 15070214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance evaluation and result comparison of the automated hematology analyzers Abbott CD 3700, Sysmex XE 2100 and Coulter LH 750 for cell counts in serous fluids.
Yang D; Zhou Y; Chen B
Clin Chim Acta; 2013 Apr; 419():113-8. PubMed ID: 23415694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter UniCel DxH 800, Beckman Coulter LH 780, and Abbott Diagnostics Cell-Dyn Sapphire hematology analyzers on adult specimens in a tertiary care hospital.
Tan BT; Nava AJ; George TI
Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Jun; 135(6):939-51. PubMed ID: 21571967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monocyte count in Coulter STKS and MAXM.
Vinatier I; Picard F; Fialon P
Am J Clin Pathol; 1992 Aug; 98(2):269-71. PubMed ID: 1510041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of the hematologic autoanalyzer Coulter Maxm].
Llompart I; Vila M; Quetglas P; Pérez G; Fuentespina E
Sangre (Barc); 1995 Apr; 40(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 7784941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
