These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7535979)
1. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging assessment of hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Spirnak JP; Nieves N; Hollsten DA; White WC; Betz TA Am J Ophthalmol; 1995 Apr; 119(4):431-40. PubMed ID: 7535979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the hydroxyapatite orbital implant. De Potter P; Shields CL; Shields JA; Flanders AE; Rao VM Ophthalmology; 1992 May; 99(5):824-30. PubMed ID: 1375714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vascularization of coralline versus synthetic hydroxyapatite orbital implants assessed by gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Celik T; Yuksel D; Kosker M; Kasim R; Simsek S Curr Eye Res; 2015 Mar; 40(3):346-53. PubMed ID: 24871378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of fibrovascular tissue ingrowth within synthetic hydroxyapatite orbital implants in children. Galluzzi P; De Francesco S; Giacalone G; Cerase A; Monti L; Vallone IM; Lazzeretti L; Venturi C; Hadjistilianou T Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(5):521-8. PubMed ID: 21279974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of vascularization of coralline hydroxyapatite ocular implants by magnetic resonance imaging. Hamilton HE; Christianson MD; Williams JP; Thomas RA Clin Imaging; 1992; 16(4):243-6. PubMed ID: 1335353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Management of exposed hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Kim YD; Goldberg RA; Shorr N; Steinsapir KD Ophthalmology; 1994 Oct; 101(10):1709-15. PubMed ID: 7936570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MRI of orbital hydroxyapatite implants. Flanders AE; De Potter P; Rao VM; Tom BM; Shields CL; Shields JA Neuroradiology; 1996 Apr; 38(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 8741201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Postcontrast magnetic resonance imaging assessment of porous polyethylene orbital implant (Medpor). De Potter P; Duprez T; Cosnard G Ophthalmology; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1656-60. PubMed ID: 10964823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Scanning with technetium-99m MDP. Numerow LM; Kloiber R; Mitchell RJ; Molnar CP; Anderson MA Clin Nucl Med; 1994 Jan; 19(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 7511087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced MRI for the assessment of vascularization of hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Qi-hua X; Chen Z; Jian-gang Z; Da-zhong Z; Yong-qiang Z Clin Imaging; 2014; 38(5):616-20. PubMed ID: 24973079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance imaging versus bone scan for assessment of vascularization of the hydroxyapatite orbital implant. Jamell GA; Hollsten DA; Hawes MJ; Griffin DJ; Klingensmith WC; White WL; Spirnak J Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1996 Jun; 12(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 8727179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of fibrovascular ingrowth into hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene orbital implants. Rubin PA; Popham JK; Bilyk JR; Shore JW Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1994 Jun; 10(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 7522048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The synthetic hydroxyapatite implant: a report on 65 patients. Jordan DR; Gilberg S; Mawn L; Brownstein S; Grahovac SZ Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Jul; 14(4):250-5. PubMed ID: 9700732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone formation in hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Green JP; Wojno TH; Wilson MW; Grossniklaus HE Am J Ophthalmol; 1995 Nov; 120(5):681-2. PubMed ID: 7485377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]