These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Comparison of the exposure rate of wrapped hydroxyapatite (Bio-Eye) versus unwrapped porous polyethylene (Medpor) orbital implants in enucleated patients. Tabatabaee Z; Mazloumi M; Rajabi MT; Khalilzadeh O; Kassaee A; Moghimi S; Eftekhar H; Goldberg RA Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011; 27(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 20829725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Porous orbital implants, wraps, and PEG placement in the pediatric population after enucleation. Wang JK; Liao SL; Lin LL; Kao SC; Tseng HS Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jul; 144(1):109-116. PubMed ID: 17499206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enucleation with unwrapped porous and nonporous orbital implants: a 15-year experience. Trichopoulos N; Augsburger JJ Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Sep; 21(5):331-6. PubMed ID: 16234693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The porous polyethylene (Medpor) spherical orbital implant: a retrospective study of 136 cases. Blaydon SM; Shepler TR; Neuhaus RW; White WL; Shore JW Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Sep; 19(5):364-71. PubMed ID: 14506421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of fibrovascular ingrowth into hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene orbital implants. Rubin PA; Popham JK; Bilyk JR; Shore JW Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1994 Jun; 10(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 7522048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exposure rates of wrapped and unwrapped orbital implants following enucleation. Li T; Shen J; Duffy MT Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2001 Nov; 17(6):431-5. PubMed ID: 11766024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bovine pericardium versus homologous sclera as a wrapping for hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Arat YO; Shetlar DJ; Boniuk M Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 May; 19(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 12918552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exposure rate of hydroxyapatite orbital implants a 15-year experience of 802 cases. Yoon JS; Lew H; Kim SJ; Lee SY Ophthalmology; 2008 Mar; 115(3):566-572.e2. PubMed ID: 17854900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Current trends in managing the anophthalmic socket after primary enucleation and evisceration. Su GW; Yen MT Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jul; 20(4):274-80. PubMed ID: 15266140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Safety of unwrapped spherical orbital implants. Perry JD; Tam RC Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jul; 20(4):281-4. PubMed ID: 15266141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Porous orbital implant exposure: the influence of surgical technique. McElnea EM; Ryan A; Fulcher T Orbit; 2014 Apr; 33(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 24215109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical and histopathologic review of 18 explanted porous polyethylene orbital implants. Chuo JY; Dolman PJ; Ng TL; Buffam FV; White VA Ophthalmology; 2009 Feb; 116(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 19091412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Late exposure of the bioceramic orbital implant. Wang JK; Lai PC; Liao SL Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 147(1):162-170.e1. PubMed ID: 18571617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hydroxyapatite orbital implant abscess: histopathologic correlation of an infected implant following evisceration. Ainbinder DJ; Haik BG; Tellado M Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1994 Dec; 10(4):267-70. PubMed ID: 7865449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term follow-up of porous polyethylene spherical implants after enucleation and evisceration. Alwitry A; West S; King J; Foss AJ; Abercrombie LC Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007; 23(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 17237682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Management of exposed hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Kim YD; Goldberg RA; Shorr N; Steinsapir KD Ophthalmology; 1994 Oct; 101(10):1709-15. PubMed ID: 7936570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Complications of orbital implants: a review of 542 patients who have undergone orbital implantation and 275 subsequent PEG placements. Shoamanesh A; Pang NK; Oestreicher JH Orbit; 2007 Sep; 26(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 17891645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]