These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7538084)
21. Stratification of prostate-specific antigen level and results of transrectal ultrasonography and digital rectal examination as predictors of positive prostate biopsy. Clark TW; Goldenberg L; Cooperberg PL; Wong AD; Singer J Can Assoc Radiol J; 1997 Aug; 48(4):252-8. PubMed ID: 9282157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Role of prostate specific antigen, transrectal ultrasonography, and digital rectal examination in the search for clinical prostate cancer]. Egawa S; Liu XX; Kuwao S; Uchida T; Yokoyama E; Mashimo S; Koshiba K Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Jul; 84(7):1236-43. PubMed ID: 7689122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The value of screening tests in the detection of prostate cancer. Part II: Retrospective analysis of free/total prostate-specific analysis ratio, age-specific reference ranges, and PSA density. Bangma CH; Kranse R; Blijenberg BG; Schröder FH Urology; 1995 Dec; 46(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 7502415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical evaluation of transrectal power doppler imaging in the detection of prostate cancer. Inahara M; Suzuki H; Nakamachi H; Kamiya N; Shimbo M; Komiya A; Ueda T; Ichikawa T; Akakura K; Ito H Int Urol Nephrol; 2004; 36(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 15368688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biopsy-proved prostate cancer in 100 consecutive men with benign digital rectal examination and elevated serum prostate-specific antigen level. Prevalence and pathologic characteristics. Guthman DA; Wilson TM; Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Zincke H; Oesterling JE Urology; 1993 Aug; 42(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 7690170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [The significance of focal hypoechoic lesions in the peripheral zone of the prostate]. Oyen R; Van Popel H; Van de Voorde W; Knapen P; Ameye F; Baert AL; Baert LV J Belge Radiol; 1995 Dec; 78(6):356-8. PubMed ID: 8576025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project. Findings on the detection of early prostate cancer in 2425 men. Mettlin C; Lee F; Drago J; Murphy GP Cancer; 1991 Jun; 67(12):2949-58. PubMed ID: 1710531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination, and transrectal ultrasound in predicting the probability of cancer. Drago JR; York JP J Surg Oncol; 1992 Mar; 49(3):172-5. PubMed ID: 1372376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The usefulness of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density in patients with intermediate serum PSA level in a country with low incidence of prostate cancer. Yu HJ; Lai MK Urology; 1998 May; 51(5A Suppl):125-30. PubMed ID: 9610567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. American Cancer Society--National Prostate Cancer Detection Project. Results from multiple examinations using transrectal ultrasound, digital rectal examination, and prostate specific antigen. Mettlin C; Murphy GP; Ray P; Shanberg A; Toi A; Chesley A; Babaian R; Badalament R; Kane RA; Lee F Cancer; 1993 Feb; 71(3 Suppl):891-8. PubMed ID: 7679042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Diagnostic significance of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in men with prostate-specific antigen levels of 4 NG/ML or less. Yamamoto T; Ito K; Ohi M; Kubota Y; Suzuki K; Fukabori Y; Kurokawa K; Yamanaka H Urology; 2001 Dec; 58(6):994-8. PubMed ID: 11744475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The role of prostate-specific antigen as part of the diagnostic triad and as a guide when to perform a biopsy. Babaian RJ; Camps JL Cancer; 1991 Nov; 68(9):2060-3. PubMed ID: 1717134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Relative contribution of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in interpreting serum prostate-specific antigen values for screening prostate cancer in Arab men. Sheikh M; Sinan T; Kehinde EO; Hussein AY; Anim JT; Al-Hunayan AA Ann Saudi Med; 2007; 27(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 17356323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Diagnostic testing for prostate cancer detection: less is best. Babaian RJ; Dinney CP; Ramirez EI; Evans RB Urology; 1993 May; 41(5):421-5. PubMed ID: 7683834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The incidence of hyperechoic prostate cancer in transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy specimens. Spajic B; Eupic H; Tomas D; Stimac G; Kruslin B; Kraus O Urology; 2007 Oct; 70(4):734-7. PubMed ID: 17991546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Follow-up of benign hypoechoic peripheral zone lesions of the prostate gland: US characteristics and cancer prevalence. Fogarty KT; Arger PH; Shibutani Y; Nodine CF; Tomaszewski JE; Coleman BG; Jacobs JE; Langer JE; Wein AJ Radiology; 1994 Apr; 191(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 7510896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Usefulness of ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in the diagnosis and treatment of localized prostate cancer]. Ogawa O; Shichiri Y; Ohnishi H; Yoshida O Hinyokika Kiyo; 1996 Oct; 42(10):805-10. PubMed ID: 8951479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical significance of small (less than 0.2 cm3) hypoechoic lesions in men with normal digital rectal examinations and prostate-specific antigen levels less than 10 ng/mL. Fleshner NE; O'Sullivan M; Premdass C; Fair WR Urology; 1999 Feb; 53(2):356-8. PubMed ID: 9933054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Extensive biopsy using a combined transperineal and transrectal approach to improve prostate cancer detection. Watanabe M; Hayashi T; Tsushima T; Irie S; Kaneshige T; Kumon H Int J Urol; 2005 Nov; 12(11):959-63. PubMed ID: 16351651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]