501 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7538244)
1. Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, laparoscopically assisted seminal vesicle mobilization, and total perineal prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Teichman JM; Reddy PK; Hulbert JC
Urology; 1995 May; 45(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 7538244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach.
Salomon L; Levrel O; Anastasiadis AG; Saint F; de La Taille A; Cicco A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002; 5(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 12627213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Seminal vesicle biopsy and laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection: implications for patient selection in the radiotherapeutic management of prostate cancer.
Stock RG; Stone NN; Ianuzzi C; Unger P
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Nov; 33(4):815-21. PubMed ID: 7591888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost comparison of radical retropubic and radical perineal prostatectomy: single institution experience.
Silverstein AD; Weizer AZ; Dowell JM; Auge BK; Paulson DF; Dahm P
Urology; 2004 Apr; 63(4):746-50. PubMed ID: 15072893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contemporary appraisal of radical perineal prostatectomy.
Janoff DM; Parra RO
J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):1863-70. PubMed ID: 15879765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perineural invasion and seminal vesicle involvement predict pelvic lymph node metastasis in men with localized carcinoma of the prostate.
Stone NN; Stock RG; Parikh D; Yeghiayan P; Unger P
J Urol; 1998 Nov; 160(5):1722-6. PubMed ID: 9783940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Invasion of seminal vesicles by adenocarcinoma of the prostate: PSA outcome determined by preoperative and postoperative factors.
Bloom KD; Richie JP; Schultz D; Renshaw A; Saegaert T; D'amico AV
Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):333-6. PubMed ID: 14972484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of robotic surgery on pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: the Brown University early robotic experience.
Yates J; Haleblian G; Stein B; Miller B; Renzulli J; Pareek G
Can J Urol; 2009 Oct; 16(5):4842-6. PubMed ID: 19796462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Seminal vesicle-sparing perineal radical prostatectomy improves early functional results in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
Albers P; Schäfers S; Löhmer H; de Geeter P
BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1050-4. PubMed ID: 17760889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Early results following radical prostatectomy in patients with capsule invasion, seminal vesicle infiltration and micrometastases].
Terhorst B; Friedrichs R
Urologe A; 1990 Mar; 29(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 2330669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. No difference in six-year biochemical failure rates with or without pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in low-risk patients with localized prostate cancer.
Bhatta-Dhar N; Reuther AM; Zippe C; Klein EA
Urology; 2004 Mar; 63(3):528-31. PubMed ID: 15028451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.
Rassweiler J; Seemann O; Schulze M; Teber D; Hatzinger M; Frede T
J Urol; 2003 May; 169(5):1689-93. PubMed ID: 12686809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Celioscopic lymphatic excision and perineal radical prostatectomy: a strategy for the treatment of prostatic cancer].
Melman A; Gladshteyn M; Stifelman M
Prog Urol; 1993 Apr; 3(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 8508202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A retrospective comparison of anesthetic management of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy.
D'Alonzo RC; Gan TJ; Moul JW; Albala DM; Polascik TJ; Robertson CN; Sun L; Dahm P; Habib AS
J Clin Anesth; 2009 Aug; 21(5):322-8. PubMed ID: 19700296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Postoperative inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Abe T; Shinohara N; Harabayashi T; Sazawa A; Suzuki S; Kawarada Y; Nonomura K
Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):326-9. PubMed ID: 17275071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in men older than 70 years of age with localized prostate cancer: comparison of morbidity, reconvalescence, and short-term clinical outcomes between younger and older men.
Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Dillenburg W; Becht E
Eur Urol; 2007 May; 51(5):1341-8; discussion 1349. PubMed ID: 17184898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: high incidence of lymph node metastasis.
Heidenreich A; Varga Z; Von Knobloch R
J Urol; 2002 Apr; 167(4):1681-6. PubMed ID: 11912387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Financial comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for localized prostate cancer: a single-institution experience.
Mouraviev V; Nosnik I; Sun L; Robertson CN; Walther P; Albala D; Moul JW; Polascik TJ
Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):311-4. PubMed ID: 17320670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
