These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

50 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 753825)

  • 1. A comparison of procedures in "otometry": absolute versus equal-loudness judgments.
    Wit HP
    J Aud Res; 1978 Apr; 18(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 753825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors affecting descending binaural loudness balances as a manifestation of adaptation.
    Young IM; Lowry LD; Menduke H
    J Aud Res; 1986 Jan; 26(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 3610992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The reliability of MCLs with pure tones and damped wave trains.
    Berger KW; Shiplett LL
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 7187911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Duration of increment, magnitude estimation adaptation and a proposed loudness function.
    Weiler EM; Cobb F
    J Aud Res; 1982 Oct; 22(4):233-9. PubMed ID: 7188204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ["Otometry" - results and Discussion of Application (author's transl)].
    von Wedel H
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1980 Feb; 59(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 7442391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of individual loudness functions by trisection of loudness ranges.
    Villchur E; Killion MC
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):693-703. PubMed ID: 18769270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comfortable loudness judgments for discrete frequency signals.
    Berger KW; Harrison LD; Monack N; Ferren GE
    J Aud Res; 1980 Apr; 20(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 7345058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monaural and binaural adaptation in sequence: SDLB analogue?
    Weiler EM; Cobb F; Sandman D; Pederson L
    J Aud Res; 1985 Jul; 25(3):149-59. PubMed ID: 3842839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comfortable loudness levels for speech: effects of signal-to-noise ratios and instructions.
    Beattie RC; Himes BE
    J Aud Res; 1984 Jul; 24(3):213-29. PubMed ID: 6545540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comfortable loudness level: stimulus effects, long-term reliability, and predictability.
    Cox RM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Dec; 32(4):816-28. PubMed ID: 2601312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of the acoustic reflex threshold at 3 kc/s for setting optimal click-presentation level in ABR testing.
    Kasden SD
    J Aud Res; 1981 Jan; 21(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 7349866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of stimulus frequency, level, and duration on auditory temporal ordering.
    Parker RM; Kasten RN; McCroskey RL; Hoyer EA
    J Aud Res; 1981 Oct; 21(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 7185814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repeated Measurement of Absolute and Relative Judgments of Loudness: Clinical Relevance for Prescriptive Fitting of Aided Target Gains for soft, Comfortable, and Loud, But Ok Sound Levels.
    Formby C; Payne J; Yang X; Wu D; Parton JM
    Semin Hear; 2017 Feb; 38(1):26-52. PubMed ID: 28286363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of extended-range frequency-response amplification in hearing aids.
    Forrester JI; Raffin MJ
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7187908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing the habituation of late auditory evoked potentials to loud and soft sound.
    Mariam M; Delb W; Corona-Strauss FI; Bloching M; Strauss DJ
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Feb; 30(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 19136731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The Würzburg auditory field, a test for prosthetic audiometry].
    Moser LM
    HNO; 1987 Aug; 35(8):318-21. PubMed ID: 3654279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relation between loudness and intensity difference limens for tones in quiet and noise backgrounds.
    Rankovic CM; Viemeister NF; Fantini DA; Cheesman MF; Uchiyama CL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jul; 84(1):150-5. PubMed ID: 3411042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Young adults' use and output level settings of personal music systems.
    Torre P
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):791-9. PubMed ID: 18633323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.