These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 753831)

  • 1. Relative intelligibility of CID spondees for normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Frank T
    J Aud Res; 1978 Apr; 18(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 753831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bone-conducted speech: intelligibility functions and threshold force levels for spondees.
    Beattie RC; Smiarowski RA
    Am J Otol; 1981 Oct; 3(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 7304720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech reception thresholds using conventional vs high-frequency spondees in normals and in subjects with marked high-frequency sensorineural loss.
    Martin FN; Jansen RM
    J Aud Res; 1985 Apr; 25(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 3842138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times.
    Baer T; Moore BC; Gatehouse S
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):49-72. PubMed ID: 8263829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of attack time and release time on speech intelligibility. A study of the effects of AGC on normal hearing and hearing impaired subjects.
    Jerlvall LB; Lindblad AC
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (6):341-53. PubMed ID: 292147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and assessment of two fixed-array microphones for use with hearing aids.
    Bilsen FA; Soede W; Berkhout AJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 8263830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time-compressed spondaic words as a measure of speech reception threshold.
    Foltner KA; Beasley DS; White SC
    J Aud Res; 1979 Oct; 19(4):255-8. PubMed ID: 262461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consonant identification in quiet and in noise with the normal and the sensorineural hearing-impaired.
    Givens GD; Jacobs-Condit L
    J Aud Res; 1981 Oct; 21(4):279-85. PubMed ID: 7186504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spondee recognition threshold as a function of set size.
    Punch JL; Howard MT
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 May; 50(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 3990257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A psychophysical evaluation of spectral enhancement.
    DiGiovanni JJ; Nelson PB; Schlauch RS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1121-35. PubMed ID: 16411801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of synthetic speech sounds by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Godfrey JJ; Millay KK
    J Aud Res; 1980 Jul; 20(3):187-203. PubMed ID: 7347740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discriminability of the quality of amplitude-compressed speech.
    Nábĕlek IV
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Dec; 27(4):571-7. PubMed ID: 6521465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. III: An attempt to determine the contribution of speaking rate to differences in intelligibility between clear and conversational speech.
    Picheny MA; Durlach NI; Braida LD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Sep; 32(3):600-3. PubMed ID: 2779204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perception of spectral contrast by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dreisbach LE; Leek MR; Lentz JJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Aug; 48(4):910-21. PubMed ID: 16378482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
    Summers V; Cord MT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spectral enhancement to improve the intelligibility of speech in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Simpson AM; Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():101-7. PubMed ID: 2356717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.