143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7540297)
1. Cost-effectiveness analysis in early detection of prostate cancer: an evaluation of six screening strategies in a randomly selected population of 2,400 men.
Gustafsson O; Carlsson P; Norming U; Nyman CR; Svensson H
Prostate; 1995 Jun; 26(6):299-309. PubMed ID: 7540297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparison between 2 techniques of screening for prostatic carcinoma. Rectal exploration and transrectal ultrasonography vs. prostate specific antigen].
Ciatto S; Bonardi R; Mazzotta A; Lombardi C; Santoni R; Cardini S; Zappa M
Radiol Med; 1994 Oct; 88(4):453-7. PubMed ID: 7527916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the digital rectal examination as a screening test for prostate cancer. Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.
Schröder FH; van der Maas P; Beemsterboer P; Kruger AB; Hoedemaeker R; Rietbergen J; Kranse R
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1998 Dec; 90(23):1817-23. PubMed ID: 9839522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The value of screening tests in the detection of prostate cancer. Part II: Retrospective analysis of free/total prostate-specific analysis ratio, age-specific reference ranges, and PSA density.
Bangma CH; Kranse R; Blijenberg BG; Schröder FH
Urology; 1995 Dec; 46(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 7502415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of prostatic specific antigen and digital rectal examination as screening tests for prostate cancer.
Candas B; Cusan L; Gomez JL; Diamond P; Suburu RE; Lévesque J; Brousseau G; Bélanger A; Labrie F
Prostate; 2000 Sep; 45(1):19-35. PubMed ID: 10960839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effective prostate cancer detection. Reduction of low-yield biopsies. Investigators of the American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project.
Littrup PJ; Kane RA; Mettlin CJ; Murphy GP; Lee F; Toi A; Badalament R; Babaian R
Cancer; 1994 Dec; 74(12):3146-58. PubMed ID: 7526969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic significance of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in men with prostate-specific antigen levels of 4 NG/ML or less.
Yamamoto T; Ito K; Ohi M; Kubota Y; Suzuki K; Fukabori Y; Kurokawa K; Yamanaka H
Urology; 2001 Dec; 58(6):994-8. PubMed ID: 11744475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changing role of 3 screening modalities in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (Rotterdam).
Beemsterboer PM; Kranse R; de Koning HJ; Habbema JD; Schröder FH
Int J Cancer; 1999 Aug; 84(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 10404100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relative contribution of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in interpreting serum prostate-specific antigen values for screening prostate cancer in Arab men.
Sheikh M; Sinan T; Kehinde EO; Hussein AY; Anim JT; Al-Hunayan AA
Ann Saudi Med; 2007; 27(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 17356323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic value of percent free prostate-specific antigen: retrospective analysis of a population-based screening study with emphasis on men with PSA levels less than 3.0 ng/mL.
Törnblom M; Norming U; Adolfsson J; Becker C; Abrahamsson PA; Lilja H; Gustafsson O
Urology; 1999 May; 53(5):945-50. PubMed ID: 10223488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early detection of prostate cancer in the ESRD population.
Khairullah QT; Pamatmat SD; Chatha M; Provenzano R; Telang D; Temple M
Clin Nephrol; 2004 May; 61(5):308-15. PubMed ID: 15182125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiple vesico-urethral biopsies following radical prostatectomy: the predictive roles of TRUS, DRE, PSA and the pathological stage.
Scattoni V; Roscigno M; Raber M; Montorsi F; Da Pozzo L; Guazzoni G; Freschi M; Rigatti P
Eur Urol; 2003 Oct; 44(4):407-14. PubMed ID: 14499673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stratification of prostate-specific antigen level and results of transrectal ultrasonography and digital rectal examination as predictors of positive prostate biopsy.
Clark TW; Goldenberg L; Cooperberg PL; Wong AD; Singer J
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1997 Aug; 48(4):252-8. PubMed ID: 9282157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project. Findings on the detection of early prostate cancer in 2425 men.
Mettlin C; Lee F; Drago J; Murphy GP
Cancer; 1991 Jun; 67(12):2949-58. PubMed ID: 1710531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characteristics of prostate cancers detected in a multimodality early detection program. The Investigators of the American Cancer Society-National Prostate Cancer Detection Project.
Mettlin C; Murphy GP; Lee F; Littrup PJ; Chesley A; Babaian R; Badalament R; Kane RA; Mostofi FK
Cancer; 1993 Sep; 72(5):1701-8. PubMed ID: 7688658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing two modalities of screening for prostate cancer: digital rectal examination + transrectal ultrasonography vs. prostate-specific antigen.
Ciatto S; Bonardi R; Mazzotta A; Lombardi C; Santoni R; Cardini S; Zappa M
Tumori; 1995; 81(4):225-9. PubMed ID: 8540115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening for prostate cancer.
Waldman AR; Osborne DM
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1994 Oct; 21(9):1513-7. PubMed ID: 7529409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography: a meta-analysis for this diagnostic triad of prostate cancer in symptomatic korean men.
Song JM; Kim CB; Chung HC; Kane RL
Yonsei Med J; 2005 Jun; 46(3):414-24. PubMed ID: 15988815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound, and prostate specific antigen for the detection of confined and clinically relevant prostate cancer.
Lee F; Littrup PJ
J Cell Biochem Suppl; 1992; 16H():69-73. PubMed ID: 1283897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experience with an assay for prostate-specific antigen and transrectal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Heman-Ackah CA; Festenstein JB; Hibbert P; Harvey DJ; Bunce CJ; Gelister JS
Br J Urol; 1997 Mar; 79(3):439-44. PubMed ID: 9117228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
