130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7540753)
1. Bone marrow one step fixation-decalcification in Lowy FMA solution: an immunohistological and in situ hybridization study.
Gaulier A; Fourcade C; Szekeres G; Pulik M
Pathol Res Pract; 1994 Dec; 190(12):1149-61. PubMed ID: 7540753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of fixation and decalcification on the immunohistochemical staining of cell-specific markers in paraffin-embedded human bone biopsies.
Mullink H; Henzen-Logmans SC; Tadema TM; Mol JJ; Meijer CJ
J Histochem Cytochem; 1985 Nov; 33(11):1103-9. PubMed ID: 2414361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The search for an optimal DNA, RNA, and protein detection by in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and solution-based methods.
Yan F; Wu X; Crawford M; Duan W; Wilding EE; Gao L; Nana-Sinkam SP; Villalona-Calero MA; Baiocchi RA; Otterson GA
Methods; 2010 Dec; 52(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 20888418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Immunoarchitecture of normal human bone marrow: a study of frozen and fixed tissue sections.
Shin SS; Sheibani K; Kezirian J; Nademanee A; Forman SJ; Lee SK; Winberg CD
Hum Pathol; 1992 Jun; 23(6):686-94. PubMed ID: 1592393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigation of bone marrow lymphocyte subsets in normal, reactive, and neoplastic states using paraffin-embedded biopsy specimens.
Horny HP; Wehrmann M; Griesser H; Tiemann M; Bültmann B; Kaiserling E
Am J Clin Pathol; 1993 Feb; 99(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 8438787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Immunohistochemical analysis of decalcified paraffin-embedded human bone marrow biopsies with emphasis on MHC class I and CD34 expression.
Loyson SA; Rademakers LH; Joling P; Vroom TM; van den Tweel JG
Histopathology; 1997 Nov; 31(5):412-9. PubMed ID: 9416481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Immunohistology on formol-sublimate fixed and paraplast embedded kidney tissue with comparison to formalin fixation and to pre-embedding immunofluorescent staining.
Eneström S
Stain Technol; 1983 Sep; 58(5):259-71. PubMed ID: 6200959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Myeloperoxidase: a specific marker for myeloid cells in paraffin sections.
Pinkus GS; Pinkus JL
Mod Pathol; 1991 Nov; 4(6):733-41. PubMed ID: 1724087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of combined immunohistochemical labeling and in situ hybridization to colocalize mRNA and protein in tissue sections.
Smith MD; Ahern M; Coleman M
Methods Mol Biol; 2006; 326():235-45. PubMed ID: 16780206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of decalcification and choice of fixative on histiocytic iron in bone marrow core biopsies.
DePalma L
Biotech Histochem; 1996 Mar; 71(2):57-60. PubMed ID: 9138530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immunohistochemical evaluation of neoplasms in bone marrow biopsies using monoclonal antibodies reactive in paraffin-embedded tissue.
Kubic VL; Brunning RD
Mod Pathol; 1989 Nov; 2(6):618-29. PubMed ID: 2587569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How we process trephine biopsy specimens: epoxy resin embedded bone marrow biopsies.
Krenacs T; Bagdi E; Stelkovics E; Bereczki L; Krenacs L
J Clin Pathol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):897-903. PubMed ID: 16126867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrasonic decalcification offers new perspectives for rapid FISH, DNA, and RT-PCR analysis in bone marrow trephines.
Reineke T; Jenni B; Abdou MT; Frigerio S; Zubler P; Moch H; Tinguely M
Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Jul; 30(7):892-6. PubMed ID: 16819333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The importance of fixation procedures on DNA template and its suitability for solution-phase polymerase chain reaction and PCR in situ hybridization.
O'Leary JJ; Browne G; Landers RJ; Crowley M; Healy IB; Street JT; Pollock AM; Murphy J; Johnson MI; Lewis FA
Histochem J; 1994 Apr; 26(4):337-46. PubMed ID: 8040006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effective application of the methanol-based PreservCyt(™) fixative and the Cellient(™) automated cell block processor to diagnostic cytopathology, immunocytochemistry, and molecular biology.
van Hemel BM; Suurmeijer AJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Aug; 41(8):734-41. PubMed ID: 23444168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preservation of RNA for in situ hybridization: Carnoy's versus formaldehyde fixation.
Urieli-Shoval S; Meek RL; Hanson RH; Ferguson M; Gordon D; Benditt EP
J Histochem Cytochem; 1992 Dec; 40(12):1879-85. PubMed ID: 1280665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In situ hybridization for vasopressin mRNA in the human supraoptic and paraventricular nucleus; quantitative aspects of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections as compared to cryostat sections.
Lucassen PJ; Goudsmit E; Pool CW; Mengod G; Palacios JM; Raadsheer FC; Guldenaar SE; Swaab DF
J Neurosci Methods; 1996 Jan; 64(1):133. PubMed ID: 8869492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproducibility of SOX-11 detection in decalcified bone marrow tissue in mantle cell lymphoma patients.
Righi S; Pileri S; Agostinelli C; Bacci F; Spagnolo S; Sabattini E
Hum Pathol; 2017 Jan; 59():94-101. PubMed ID: 27720733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of monoclonal antibodies reactive with lymphocyte subsets in routinely fixed paraffin-embedded material: flow cytometric analyses, immunoperoxidase staining and influence of fixatives.
Yoshino T; Hoshida Y; Murakami I; Takahashi K; Akagi T
Acta Med Okayama; 1990 Oct; 44(5):243-50. PubMed ID: 1701954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation analysis of bone marrow trephine biopsy specimens; an additional tool in the diagnostic armoury.
Neat MJ; Moonim MT; Dunn RG; Geoghegan H; Foot NJ
J Clin Pathol; 2013 Jan; 66(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 23038690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
