These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7541398)

  • 21. An evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment with adolescents with emotional-behavioral disorders in an educational setting.
    Paramore NW; Higbee TS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2005; 38(3):399-403. PubMed ID: 16270849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of reinforcer magnitude and distribution on preference for work schedules.
    Ward-Horner JC; Pittenger A; Pace G; Fienup DM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(3):623-7. PubMed ID: 24825241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Noncontingent reinforcement is an empirically supported treatment for problem behavior exhibited by individuals with developmental disabilities.
    Carr JE; Severtson JM; Lepper TL
    Res Dev Disabil; 2009; 30(1):44-57. PubMed ID: 18467073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment-based intervention for severe behavior problems in a natural family context.
    Vaughn BJ; Clarke S; Dunlap G
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(4):713-6. PubMed ID: 9433797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of subject- versus experimenter-selected reinforcers on the behavior of individuals with profound developmental disabilities.
    Smith RG; Iwata BA; Shore BA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 7706151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of assessment methods for identifying social reinforcers.
    Kelly MA; Roscoe EM; Hanley GP; Schlichenmeyer K
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(1):113-35. PubMed ID: 24604393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of mand selection for functional communication training packages.
    Winborn L; Wacker DP; Richman DM; Asmus J; Geier D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(3):295-8. PubMed ID: 12365744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
    Newland MC; Reile PA; Langston JL
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A brief computer-based assessment of reinforcer dimensions affecting choice.
    Neef NA; Lutz MN
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 11317987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Increasing the efficiency of paired-stimulus preference assessments by identifying categories of preference.
    Ciccone FJ; Graff RB; Ahearn WH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 25754896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Infrequent, but not frequent, reinforcers produce more variable responding and deficient sustained attention in young children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
    Aase H; Sagvolden T
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2006 May; 47(5):457-71. PubMed ID: 16671929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Examination of relative reinforcement effects of stimuli identified through pretreatment and daily brief preference assessments.
    DeLeon IG; Fisher WW; Rodriguez-Catter V; Maglieri K; Herman K; Marhefka JM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(4):463-73. PubMed ID: 11800185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of the predictive validity and consistency among preference assessment procedures: a review of the literature.
    Kang S; O'Reilly M; Lancioni G; Falcomata TS; Sigafoos J; Xu Z
    Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Apr; 34(4):1125-33. PubMed ID: 23357675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of reinforcer choice measured in single-operant and concurrent-schedule procedures.
    Geckeler AS; Libby ME; Graff RB; Ahearn WH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 11051580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A method for evaluating parameters of reinforcement during parent-child interactions.
    Borrero CS; Vollmer TR; Borrero JC; Bourret J
    Res Dev Disabil; 2005; 26(6):577-92. PubMed ID: 16303585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Behavioral assessment of impulsivity: a comparison of children with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Neef NA; Marckel J; Ferreri SJ; Bicard DF; Endo S; Aman MG; Miller KM; Jung S; Nist L; Armstrong N
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2005; 38(1):23-37. PubMed ID: 15898472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Choice and preference assessment research with people with severe to profound developmental disabilities: a review of the literature.
    Cannella HI; O'Reilly MF; Lancioni GE
    Res Dev Disabil; 2005; 26(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 15590233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing preferences for positive and negative reinforcement during treatment of destructive behavior with functional communication training.
    Fisher WW; Adelinis JD; Volkert VM; Keeney KM; Neidert PL; Hovanetz A
    Res Dev Disabil; 2005; 26(2):153-68. PubMed ID: 15590246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Schedule thinning following communication training: using competing stimuli to enhance tolerance to decrements in reinforcer density.
    Hagopian LP; Kuhn SA; Long ES; Rush KS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2005; 38(2):177-93. PubMed ID: 16033165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Descriptive assessment of problem behavior during transitions of children with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
    Castillo MI; Clark DR; Schaller EA; Donaldson JM; DeLeon IG; Kahng S
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Jan; 51(1):99-117. PubMed ID: 29359370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.