130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7541680)
1. The 'dice' game: a new test of pragmatic language skills after closed-head injury.
McDonald S; Pearce S
Brain Inj; 1995 Apr; 9(3):255-71. PubMed ID: 7541680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Communication disorders following closed head injury: new approaches to assessment and rehabilitation.
McDonald S
Brain Inj; 1992; 6(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 1374675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Processing of basic speech acts following localized brain damage: a new light on the neuroanatomy of language.
Soroker N; Kasher A; Giora R; Batori G; Corn C; Gil M; Zaidel E
Brain Cogn; 2005 Mar; 57(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 15708219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interaction between tone and intonation in Thai after unilateral brain damage.
Gandour J; Ponglorpisit S; Potisuk S; Khunadorn F; Boongird P; Dechongkit S
Brain Lang; 1997 Jun; 58(1):174-96. PubMed ID: 9184102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Narrative and procedural discourse after closed head injury.
Hartley LL; Jensen PJ
Brain Inj; 1991; 5(3):267-85. PubMed ID: 1718519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of discourse analyses for the evaluation of higher level traumatically brain-injured adults.
Coelho CA; Liles BZ; Duffy RJ
Brain Inj; 1991; 5(4):381-92. PubMed ID: 1786501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating computational models in cognitive neuropsychology: the case from the consonant/vowel distinction.
Knobel M; Caramazza A
Brain Lang; 2007 Jan; 100(1):95-100; discussion 101-8. PubMed ID: 16879863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of pragmatic communication skills in adolescents after traumatic brain injury.
Turkstra LS; McDonald S; Kaufmann PM
Brain Inj; 1996 May; 10(5):329-45. PubMed ID: 8735664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Severe closed-head injury in childhood: linguistic outcomes into adulthood.
Jordan FM; Murdoch BE
Brain Inj; 1994; 8(6):501-8. PubMed ID: 7527267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Linguistic status following closed head injury in children: a follow-up study.
Jordan FM; Murdoch BE
Brain Inj; 1990; 4(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 1691939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reviewing the quality of discourse information measures in aphasia.
Pritchard M; Hilari K; Cocks N; Dipper L
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2017 Nov; 52(6):689-732. PubMed ID: 28560767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic aphasia in progressive supranuclear palsy: a deficit in generating a fluent sequence of novel thought.
Robinson G; Shallice T; Cipolotti L
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(8):1344-60. PubMed ID: 16504225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Linguistics in a neuropsychiatric frame. A look at the dialogue of brain and mind.
Critchley EM
Br J Psychiatry; 1994 Nov; 165(5):573-6. PubMed ID: 7866672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Three discourse profiles of closed-head-injury speakers: theoretical and clinical implications.
Hartley LL; Jensen PJ
Brain Inj; 1992; 6(3):271-81. PubMed ID: 1374674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Disturbances of speech prosody following right hemisphere infarcts.
Brådvik B; Dravins C; Holtås S; Rosén I; Ryding E; Ingvar DH
Acta Neurol Scand; 1991 Aug; 84(2):114-26. PubMed ID: 1719738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Suppression and facilitation of pragmatic performance: effects of emotional content on discourse following right and left brain damage.
Bloom RL; Borod JC; Obler LK; Gerstman LJ
J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Dec; 36(6):1227-35. PubMed ID: 8114490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impaired performance of right-brain-damaged patients on a sentence anagram task.
Murasugi K; Schneiderman E
Brain Cogn; 2005 Mar; 57(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 15708212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Selective attention and aphasia in adults: preliminary findings.
Petry MC; Crosson B; Gonzalez Rothi LJ; Bauer RM; Schauer CA
Neuropsychologia; 1994 Nov; 32(11):1397-408. PubMed ID: 7533276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neural substrates of linguistic prosody: evidence from syntactic disambiguation in the productions of brain-damaged patients.
Shah AP; Baum SR; Dwivedi VD
Brain Lang; 2006 Jan; 96(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 15922444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A cross-validation study on the Token Test.
Hartje W; Kerschensteiner M; Poeck K; Orgass B
Neuropsychologia; 1973 Jan; 11(1):119-21. PubMed ID: 4694774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
