641 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7542822)
1. Normal range prostate-specific antigen versus age-specific prostate-specific antigen in screening prostate adenocarcinoma.
el-Galley RE; Petros JA; Sanders WH; Keane TE; Galloway NT; Cooner WH; Graham SD
Urology; 1995 Aug; 46(2):200-4. PubMed ID: 7542822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The value of screening tests in the detection of prostate cancer. Part II: Retrospective analysis of free/total prostate-specific analysis ratio, age-specific reference ranges, and PSA density.
Bangma CH; Kranse R; Blijenberg BG; Schröder FH
Urology; 1995 Dec; 46(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 7502415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Free prostate-specific antigen improves prostate cancer detection in a high-risk population of men with a normal total PSA and digitalrectal examination.
Uzzo RG; Pinover WH; Horwitz EM; Parlanti A; Mazzoni S; Raysor S; Mirchandani I; Greenberg RE; Pollack A; Hanks GE; Watkins-Bruner D
Urology; 2003 Apr; 61(4):754-9. PubMed ID: 12670560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usefulness of age-specific reference range of prostate-specific antigen for Japanese men older than 60 years in mass screening for prostate cancer.
Ito K; Yamamoto T; Kubota Y; Suzuki K; Fukabori Y; Kurokawa K; Yamanaka H
Urology; 2000 Aug; 56(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 10925094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Yield of ultrasonography-guided transrectal biopsy in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the prostate].
Fernández González I; Ruiz Rubio JL; Llorente Abarca C; Aramburu González JA; Montes Díaz MJ; Herrero Payo A; Sánchez Sánchez E; Berenguer Sánchez A
Arch Esp Urol; 1995; 48(6):587-94. PubMed ID: 7544968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of prostatic carcinoma: the role of TRUS, TRUS guided biopsy, digital rectal examination, PSA and PSA density.
Men S; Cakar B; Conkbayir I; Hekimoglu B
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2001 Dec; 20(4):473-80. PubMed ID: 11876539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relative contribution of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in interpreting serum prostate-specific antigen values for screening prostate cancer in Arab men.
Sheikh M; Sinan T; Kehinde EO; Hussein AY; Anim JT; Al-Hunayan AA
Ann Saudi Med; 2007; 27(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 17356323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic value of percent free prostate-specific antigen: retrospective analysis of a population-based screening study with emphasis on men with PSA levels less than 3.0 ng/mL.
Törnblom M; Norming U; Adolfsson J; Becker C; Abrahamsson PA; Lilja H; Gustafsson O
Urology; 1999 May; 53(5):945-50. PubMed ID: 10223488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low AUA symptom score independently predicts positive prostate needle biopsy: results from a racially diverse series of 411 patients.
Porter CR; Kim J
Urology; 2004 Jan; 63(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 14751356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incidental carcinoma of the prostate.
van Andel G; Vleeming R; Kurth K; de Reijke TM
Semin Surg Oncol; 1995; 11(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 7538693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stratification of prostate-specific antigen level and results of transrectal ultrasonography and digital rectal examination as predictors of positive prostate biopsy.
Clark TW; Goldenberg L; Cooperberg PL; Wong AD; Singer J
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1997 Aug; 48(4):252-8. PubMed ID: 9282157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of prostate voxels identified as suspicious of malignancy on three-dimensional (1)H MR spectroscopic imaging in patients with abnormal digital rectal examination or raised prostate specific antigen level of 4-10 ng/ml.
Kumar V; Jagannathan NR; Kumar R; Thulkar S; Gupta SD; Hemal AK; Gupta NP
NMR Biomed; 2007 Feb; 20(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 16894640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison between 2 techniques of screening for prostatic carcinoma. Rectal exploration and transrectal ultrasonography vs. prostate specific antigen].
Ciatto S; Bonardi R; Mazzotta A; Lombardi C; Santoni R; Cardini S; Zappa M
Radiol Med; 1994 Oct; 88(4):453-7. PubMed ID: 7527916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the digital rectal examination as a screening test for prostate cancer. Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.
Schröder FH; van der Maas P; Beemsterboer P; Kruger AB; Hoedemaeker R; Rietbergen J; Kranse R
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1998 Dec; 90(23):1817-23. PubMed ID: 9839522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biopsy-proved prostate cancer in 100 consecutive men with benign digital rectal examination and elevated serum prostate-specific antigen level. Prevalence and pathologic characteristics.
Guthman DA; Wilson TM; Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Zincke H; Oesterling JE
Urology; 1993 Aug; 42(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 7690170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The outcomes of transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate in a New Zealand population.
Lienert AR; Davidson PJ; Wells JE
N Z Med J; 2009 Jan; 122(1288):39-49. PubMed ID: 19182841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Relationship between screening by stratifying cases into groups on prostate specific antigen level and the positive rate of transrectal ultrasound guided systematic sextant prostate biopsy].
Cao XL; Gao JP; Han G; Tang J; Hong BF
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 44(6):372-5. PubMed ID: 16638344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effective prostate cancer detection. Reduction of low-yield biopsies. Investigators of the American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project.
Littrup PJ; Kane RA; Mettlin CJ; Murphy GP; Lee F; Toi A; Badalament R; Babaian R
Cancer; 1994 Dec; 74(12):3146-58. PubMed ID: 7526969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical usefulness of free PSA in early detection of prostate cancer.
Luboldt HJ; Swoboda A; Börgermann C; Fornara P; Rübben H;
Onkologie; 2001 Feb; 24(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 11441278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Real-time elastography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: personal experience].
Romagnoli A; Autieri G; Centrella D; Gastaldi C; Pedaci G; Rivolta L; Pozzi E; Anghileri A; Cerabino M; Bianchi CM; Roggia A
Urologia; 2010; 77(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 21234867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
