These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 754379)

  • 1. Preschool visual acuity screening tests.
    Friendly DS
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1978; 76():383-480. PubMed ID: 754379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision In Preschoolers Study.
    Schmidt P; Maguire M; Dobson V; Quinn G; Ciner E; Cyert L; Kulp MT; Moore B; Orel-Bixler D; Redford M; Ying GS;
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Apr; 111(4):637-50. PubMed ID: 15051194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Children unable to perform screening tests in vision in preschoolers study: proportion with ocular conditions and impact on measures of test accuracy.
    Maguire MG;
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jan; 48(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 17197520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effectiveness of the random dot E stereotest as a preschool vision screening instrument.
    Rosner J
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1978 Oct; 49(10):1121-4. PubMed ID: 730980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Seoul Metropolitan Preschool Vision Screening Programme: results from South Korea.
    Lim HT; Yu YS; Park SH; Ahn H; Kim S; Lee M; Jeong JY; Shin KH; Koo BS
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):929-33. PubMed ID: 15205240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Landolt C and snellen e acuity: differences in strabismus amblyopia?].
    Becker R; Gräf M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Jan; 223(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 16418930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of confidence number on the screening accuracy of the retinomax autorefractor.
    VISION IN PRESCHOOLERS STUDY GROUP
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 84(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 17435531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Major review: The underutilization of vision screening (for amblyopia, optical anomalies and strabismus) among preschool age children.
    Castanes MS
    Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2003; 18(4):217-32. PubMed ID: 14653775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using the KM visual acuity chart for more reliable evaluation of amblyopia compared to the HVOT method.
    Moutakis K; Stigmar G; Hall-Lindberg J
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Oct; 82(5):547-51. PubMed ID: 15453851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is the Cardiff Acuity Test effective in detecting refractive errors in children?
    Howard C; Firth AY
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):577-81. PubMed ID: 16909076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in children aged 5 to 12 years.
    Rice ML; Leske DA; Holmes JM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 137(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 14962417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving the reliability of visual acuity measures in young children.
    McGraw PV; Winn B; Gray LS; Elliott DB
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 May; 20(3):173-84. PubMed ID: 10897339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preschool vision screening tests administered by nurse screeners compared with lay screeners in the vision in preschoolers study.
    Vision in Preschoolers Study Group
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Aug; 46(8):2639-48. PubMed ID: 16043831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vision screening in children by Plusoptix Vision Screener compared with gold-standard orthoptic assessment.
    Dahlmann-Noor AH; Vrotsou K; Kostakis V; Brown J; Heath J; Iron A; McGill S; Vivian AJ
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 93(3):342-5. PubMed ID: 19019940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The random dot test as a screening method for the visual acuity in children (author's transl)].
    van Laer P; Blum K; Niesel P
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1978 Apr; 172(4):635-8. PubMed ID: 651245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rotterdam AMblyopia screening effectiveness study: detection and causes of amblyopia in a large birth cohort.
    Groenewoud JH; Tjiam AM; Lantau VK; Hoogeveen WC; de Faber JT; Juttmann RE; de Koning HJ; Simonsz HJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jul; 51(7):3476-84. PubMed ID: 20089868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Early case finding of amblyopia].
    Swaak AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1978 Feb; 122(5):141-6. PubMed ID: 625356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The Teller Acuity Card Test: possibilities and limits of clinical use].
    Katz B; Sireteanu R
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1989 Jul; 195(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 2796227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Method for identifying amblyopes whose reduced line acuity is caused by defective selection and/or control of gaze.
    Regan D; Giaschi DE; Kraft SP; Kothe AC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Oct; 12(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 1293529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Refractive errors and amblyopia in children entering school: Shahrood, Iran.
    Jamali P; Fotouhi A; Hashemi H; Younesian M; Jafari A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Apr; 86(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 19289975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.