BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7545206)

  • 1. The use of dolls to interview young children: issues of symbolic representation.
    DeLoache JS; Marzolf DP
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1995 Aug; 60(1):155-73. PubMed ID: 7545206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Children's use of anatomically detailed dolls to recount an event.
    Goodman GS; Aman C
    Child Dev; 1990 Dec; 61(6):1859-71. PubMed ID: 2083502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sexualized doll play among young children: implications for the use of anatomical dolls in sexual abuse evaluations.
    Everson MD; Boat BW
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1990 Sep; 29(5):736-42. PubMed ID: 2228926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The accuracy of children's reports with anatomically correct dolls.
    Katz SM; Schonfeld DJ; Carter AS; Leventhal JM; Cicchetti DV
    J Dev Behav Pediatr; 1995 Apr; 16(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 7790517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychological science and the use of anatomically detailed dolls in child sexual-abuse assessments.
    Koocher GP; Goodman GS; White CS; Friedrich WN; Sivan AB; Reynolds CR
    Psychol Bull; 1995 Sep; 118(2):199-222. PubMed ID: 7568570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anatomical dolls: their use in assessment of children who may have been sexually abused.
    Faller KC
    J Child Sex Abus; 2005; 14(3):1-21. PubMed ID: 16203692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anatomically correct dolls used in interviews of young children suspected of having been sexually abused.
    Leventhal JM; Hamilton J; Rekedal S; Tebano-Micci A; Eyster C
    Pediatrics; 1989 Nov; 84(5):900-6. PubMed ID: 2797984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Specificity and sensitivity of sexually anatomically correct dolls in substantiating abuse: a pilot study.
    Realmuto GM; Jensen JB; Wescoe S
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1990 Sep; 29(5):743-6. PubMed ID: 2228927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assumptions and beliefs about the role of AD dolls in child sexual abuse validation interviews: are they supported empirically?
    Skinner LJ
    Behav Sci Law; 1996; 14(2):167-85. PubMed ID: 10160234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploratory assessments of child abuse: children's responses to interviewer's questions across multiple interview sessions.
    Patterson T; Pipe ME
    Child Abuse Negl; 2009 Aug; 33(8):490-504. PubMed ID: 19766310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Developmental differences in the function and use of anatomical dolls during interviews with alleged sexual abuse victims.
    Thierry KL; Lamb ME; Orbach Y; Pipe ME
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2005 Dec; 73(6):1125-34. PubMed ID: 16392985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of nonanatomical dolls in the sexual abuse interview.
    Britton HL; O'Keefe MA
    Child Abuse Negl; 1991; 15(4):567-73. PubMed ID: 1959088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interviewing young children about body touch and handling.
    Steward MS; Steward DS
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 1996; 61(4-5):1-214. PubMed ID: 8972588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Agreement among professionals about a child's sexual abuse status: interviews with sexually anatomically correct dolls as indicators of abuse.
    Realmuto GM; Wescoe S
    Child Abuse Negl; 1992; 16(5):719-25. PubMed ID: 1393730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anatomically-neutral dolls: their effects on the memory and suggestibility of 4- to 6-year-old eyewitnesses.
    Samra J; Yuille JC
    Child Abuse Negl; 1996 Dec; 20(12):1261-72. PubMed ID: 8985617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigative interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims with and without anatomical dolls.
    Lamb ME; Hershkowitz I; Sternberg KJ; Boat B; Everson MD
    Child Abuse Negl; 1996 Dec; 20(12):1251-9. PubMed ID: 8985616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interviewing young sexual abuse victims with anatomically correct dolls.
    White S; Strom GA; Santilli G; Halpin BM
    Child Abuse Negl; 1986; 10(4):519-29. PubMed ID: 3791029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Socioemotional factors in child sexual abuse investigations.
    Hershkowitz I
    Child Maltreat; 2009 May; 14(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 19047478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anatomical doll play of preschoolers referred for sexual abuse and those not referred.
    Cohn DS
    Child Abuse Negl; 1991; 15(4):455-66. PubMed ID: 1959077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The response of young, non-sexually abused children to anatomically correct dolls.
    Glaser D; Collins C
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 1989 Jul; 30(4):547-60. PubMed ID: 2768357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.