These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7546090)

  • 1. Evaluation of two wound measurement methods in a multi-center, controlled study.
    Etris MB; Pribble J; LaBrecque J
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1994 Sep; 40(7):44-8. PubMed ID: 7546090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A study of the efficiency and convenience of an advanced portable Wound Measurement System (VISITRAK).
    Sugama J; Matsui Y; Sanada H; Konya C; Okuwa M; Kitagawa A
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Jul; 16(7):1265-9. PubMed ID: 17584344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wound measurement comparing the use of acetate tracings and Visitrak digital planimetry.
    Gethin G; Cowman S
    J Clin Nurs; 2006 Apr; 15(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 16553755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methods of measuring wound size: a comparative study.
    Plassmann P; Melhuish JM; Harding KG
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1994 Sep; 40(7):50-2, 54, 56-60. PubMed ID: 7546091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Photographic assessment of the appearance of chronic pressure and leg ulcers.
    Houghton PE; Kincaid CB; Campbell KE; Woodbury MG; Keast DH
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Apr; 46(4):20-6, 28-30. PubMed ID: 10788924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wound assessment: measuring the area of a leg ulcer.
    Charles H
    Br J Nurs; 1998 Jul 9-22; 7(13):765-8, 770, 772. PubMed ID: 9732568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The healing wound: a comparison of three clinically useful methods of measurement.
    Thomas AC; Wysocki AB
    Decubitus; 1990 Feb; 3(1):18-20, 24-5. PubMed ID: 2322408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wound shape geometry measurements correlate to eventual wound healing.
    Cardinal M; Eisenbud DE; Armstrong DG
    Wound Repair Regen; 2009; 17(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 19320884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wound debridement: Comparative reliability of three methods for measuring fibrin percentage in chronic wounds.
    Laplaud AL; Blaizot X; Gaillard C; Morice A; Lebreuilly I; Clément C; Parienti JJ; Dompmartin A
    Wound Repair Regen; 2010; 18(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 20082676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of the measurement of four wound variables in elderly patients with pressure ulcers.
    Schubert V; Zander M
    Adv Wound Care; 1996; 9(4):29-36. PubMed ID: 9069740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wound areas by computerized planimetry of digital images: accuracy and reliability.
    Mayrovitz HN; Soontupe LB
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 May; 22(5):222-9. PubMed ID: 19521289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional documentation of wound healing: first results of a new objective method for measurement.
    Körber A; Rietkötter J; Grabbe S; Dissemond J
    J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2006 Oct; 4(10):848-54. PubMed ID: 17010174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving accuracy of wound measurement in clinical practice.
    Flanagan M
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Oct; 49(10):28-40. PubMed ID: 14652419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-dimensional wound measurement: comparison of 4 techniques.
    Langemo DK; Melland H; Hanson D; Olson B; Hunter S; Henly SJ
    Adv Wound Care; 1998; 11(7):337-43. PubMed ID: 10326350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring wound length, width, and area: which technique?
    Langemo D; Anderson J; Hanson D; Hunter S; Thompson P
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Jan; 21(1):42-5; quiz 45-7. PubMed ID: 18156829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lower extremity ulcer image segmentation of visual and near-infrared imagery.
    Bochko V; Välisuo P; Harju T; Alander J
    Skin Res Technol; 2010 May; 16(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 20456099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Initial healing rates of venous ulcers: are they useful as predictors of healing?
    Hill DP; Poore S; Wilson J; Robson MC; Cherry GW
    Am J Surg; 2004 Jul; 188(1A Suppl):22-5. PubMed ID: 15223498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of quantitative methodologies to define chronic pressure ulcer measurements.
    Cutler NR; George R; Seifert RD; Brunelle R; Sramek JJ; McNeill K; Boyd WM
    Decubitus; 1993 Nov; 6(6):22-30. PubMed ID: 8286024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A comparison of digital planimetry and transparency tracing based methods for measuring diabetic cutaneous ulcer surface area].
    Wang Y; Liu G; Yuan N; Ran X
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 May; 22(5):563-6. PubMed ID: 18630436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Treatment of ischemic wounds with noncontact, low-frequency ultrasound: the Mayo clinic experience, 2004-2006.
    Kavros SJ; Miller JL; Hanna SW
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2007 Apr; 20(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 17415030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.