These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7546480)

  • 1. Effect of long-term water storage on dentin bonding.
    Gwinnett AJ; Yu S
    Am J Dent; 1995 Apr; 8(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 7546480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of wet and dry bonding techniques on marginal leakage.
    Santini A; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):219-24. PubMed ID: 10388380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term durability of resin dentin interface: nanoleakage vs. microtensile bond strength.
    Okuda M; Pereira PN; Nakajima M; Tagami J; Pashley DH
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 12022462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
    Chersoni S; Lorenzi R; Ferrieri P; Prati C
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term effect of dentin primers on enamel bond strength and marginal adaptation.
    Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 11203784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of shear and flexural bond strength tests versus failure modes of dentin bonding systems.
    Dunn WJ; Söderholm KJ
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):297-303. PubMed ID: 11803994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of interfacial bond quality on the direction of polymerization shrinkage flow in resin composite restorations.
    Cho BH; Dickens SH; Bae JH; Chang CG; Son HH; Um CM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 12022463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of layering techniques on the micro-tensile bond strength to dentin in resin composite restorations.
    Niu Y; Ma X; Fan M; Zhu S
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 18614225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enamel and dentin bond strength and bonding mechanism to dentin of Gluma CPS to primary teeth.
    Fritz U; García-Godoy F; Finger WJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 9096816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations.
    Owens BM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Feb; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12595929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative contribution of resin infiltration/hybridization to dentin bonding.
    Gwinnett AJ
    Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 8329167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal adaptation of resin-bonded light-cured glass ionomers in dentin cavities.
    Fritz UB; Finger WJ; Uno S
    Am J Dent; 1996 Dec; 9(6):253-8. PubMed ID: 9545879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative in vivo and in vitro investigation of interfacial bond variability.
    Hannig M; Friedrichs C
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11203774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Altered tissue contribution to interfacial bond strength with acid conditioned dentin.
    Gwinnett AJ
    Am J Dent; 1994 Oct; 7(5):243-6. PubMed ID: 7986445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shear bond strength, microleakage, and confocal studies of 4 amalgam alloy bonding agents.
    Grobler SR; Oberholzer TG; Rossouw RJ; Grobler-Rabie A; Van Wyk Kotze TJ
    Quintessence Int; 2000; 31(7):501-8. PubMed ID: 11203971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.