61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7546896)
1. [A critical reading and interpretation of the results of phase III trials and meta-analysis].
Piedbois P; Buyse M
Bull Cancer Radiother; 1995; 82(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 7546896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Statistics in oncology.
Land SR; Abrams J; Buyse M; Chappell RJ
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Aug; 26(22):3668. PubMed ID: 18669450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Graphical methods for detecting bias in meta-analysis.
Ferrer RL
Fam Med; 1998 Sep; 30(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 9773289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials.
Pildal J; Hróbjartsson A; Jørgensen KJ; Hilden J; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC
Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):847-57. PubMed ID: 17517809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-analyses of chronic disease trials with competing causes of death may yield biased odds ratios.
Koller MT; Stijnen T; Steyerberg EW; Lubsen J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 18313561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Deriving treatment recommendations from evidence within randomized trials. The role and limitation of meta-analysis.
Freemantle N; Mason J; Eccles M
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(2):304-15. PubMed ID: 10507190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Meta-analyses of randomized trials in oncology: pros and cons].
Hill C; Pignon JP
Bull Cancer; 1999 Mar; 86(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 10210759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bias in meta-analysis and funnel plot asymmetry.
Biljana M; Jelena M; Branislav J; Milorad R
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 68():323-8. PubMed ID: 10724898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta-analysis in medical research: potentials and limitations.
Zwahlen M; Renehan A; Egger M
Urol Oncol; 2008; 26(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 18452828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery.
Gurusamy KS; Gluud C; Nikolova D; Davidson BR
Br J Surg; 2009 Apr; 96(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 19283747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Drawing generalized causal inferences based on meta-analysis.
Matt GE
NIDA Res Monogr; 1997; 170():165-82. PubMed ID: 9154257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
Tierney JF; Stewart LA
Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Importance of a wide perspective on meta-analysis. It may be of crucial significance for the patients].
Gøtzsche PC
Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Oct; 162(42):5601. PubMed ID: 11059294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Why add anything to nothing? The arcsine difference as a measure of treatment effect in meta-analysis with zero cells.
Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J; Olkin I
Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(5):721-38. PubMed ID: 19072749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of meta-analysis in monitoring clinical trials.
Begg CB
Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1299-306; discussion 1307-11. PubMed ID: 8817803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evidence based medicine. The facts in the North countries].
Lemarié E
Rev Mal Respir; 2006 Sep; 23(4 Pt 2):10S9-10S12. PubMed ID: 17127953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Meta-analysis and meta-analytic monitoring of clinical trials.
Feinstein AR
Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1273-80; discussion 1281-3. PubMed ID: 8817801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Further statistics in dentistry Part 8: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Petrie A; Bulman JS; Osborn JF
Br Dent J; 2003 Jan; 194(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 12577072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Continuous toxicity monitoring in phase II trials in oncology.
Ivanova A; Qaqish BF; Schell MJ
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):540-5. PubMed ID: 16011702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
