These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7546970)

  • 1. The use of a reinforced glass-ionomer cermet for the restoration of primary molars: a clinical trial.
    Kilpatrick NM; Murray JJ; McCabe JF
    Br Dent J; 1995 Sep; 179(5):175-9. PubMed ID: 7546970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Glass ionomers in proximal cavities of primary molars.
    Forsten L; Karjalainen S
    Scand J Dent Res; 1990 Feb; 98(1):70-3. PubMed ID: 2109348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Glass ionomer-silver cermet Class II tunnel-restorations for primary molars.
    Croll TP
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1988; 55(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 2968382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical behaviour of glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth.
    Espelid I; Tveit AB; Tornes KH; Alvheim H
    J Dent; 1999 Aug; 27(6):437-42. PubMed ID: 10399410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage of Class 2 glass-ionomer-silver restorations in primary molars.
    Fuks AB; Holan G; Simon H; Lewinstein I
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(2):62-9. PubMed ID: 1437689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer-silver cermet restorations in primary molars: one year results.
    Hung TW; Richardson AS
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1990 Mar; 56(3):239-40. PubMed ID: 2110027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results.
    Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
    J Dent Res; 1997 Jul; 76(7):1387-96. PubMed ID: 9207772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A pilot study of the marginal adaptation and surface morphology of glass-cermet cements.
    Chu CH; King NM; Lee AM; Yiu CK; Wei SH
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Jul; 27(7):493-501. PubMed ID: 8941827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
    Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of glass cermet cement and amalgam restorations in primary molars.
    Hickel R; Voss A
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1990; 57(3):184-8. PubMed ID: 2111833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results.
    Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM; Yip HK; Smales RJ
    Int Dent J; 2004 Feb; 54(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 15005472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal leakage of Class II glass-ionomer-silver restorations, with and without posterior composite coverage: an in vitro study.
    Guelmann M; Fuks AB; Holan G; Grajower R
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1989; 56(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 2503551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Occlusal glass ionomer cermet, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations: a 2-year clinical study.
    Lidums A; Wilkie R; Smales R
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 7803005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro comparative fluoride release, and weight and volume change in light-curing and self-curing glass ionomer materials.
    Wandera A; Spencer P; Bohaty B
    Pediatr Dent; 1996; 18(3):210-4. PubMed ID: 8784911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
    Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
    Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lateral-access Class II restoration using resin-modified glass-ionomer or silver-cermet cement.
    Croll TP
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 7568722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Class II glass ionomer/silver cermet restorations and their effect on interproximal growth of mutans streptococci.
    Berg JH; Farrell JE; Brown LR
    Pediatr Dent; 1990 Feb; 12(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 2119036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fluoride release from glass ionomer-lined amalgam restorations.
    Olsen BT; Garcia-Godoy F; Marshall TD; Barnwell GM
    Am J Dent; 1989 Jun; 2(3):89-91. PubMed ID: 2513842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Class II amalgam restorations, glass-ionomer tunnel restorations, and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: a 3-year clinical study.
    Svanberg M
    Caries Res; 1992; 26(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 1423449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Cermet cements for milk tooth fillings. Preliminary results].
    Hickel R; Petschelt A; Voss A
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Jun; 44(6):444-5. PubMed ID: 2517110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.