These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7547485)

  • 41. A clinical evaluation of a light-cured fissure sealant (Helioseal).
    De Craene GP; Martens LC; Dermaut LR; Surmont PA
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1989; 56(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 2656793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A comparison of retention and the effect on caries of fissure sealing with a glass-ionomer and a resin-based sealant.
    Poulsen S; Beiruti N; Sadat N
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2001 Aug; 29(4):298-301. PubMed ID: 11515644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Fissure sealing with a light-cured resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement (Vitrebond) compared with a resin sealant.
    Raadal M; Utkilen AB; Nilsen OL
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 1996 Dec; 6(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 9161190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison between two glass-ionomer sealants placed using finger pressure (ART approach) and a ball burnisher.
    Beiruti N; Frencken JE; Mulder J
    Am J Dent; 2006 Jun; 19(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 16838480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of fissure sealants retention following four different isolation and surface preparation techniques: four years clinical trial.
    Lygidakis NA; Oulis KI; Christodoulidis A
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1994; 19(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 7865418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. In vitro evaluation of sealing pits and fissures with newer glass-ionomer cements developed for the ART technique.
    Smales RJ; Gao W; Ho FT
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(4):321-3. PubMed ID: 9484119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Clinical evaluation of a medium-filled flowable restorative material as a pit and fissure sealant.
    Autio-Gold JT
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 12120768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A three-year follow-up of glass ionomer cement and resin fissure sealants.
    Karlzén-Reuterving G; van Dijken JW
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1995; 62(2):108-10. PubMed ID: 7608367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Resin and glass-ionomer sealants. Indications, mechanism of action, and application technics].
    Rengo R; Crea D; De Fazio P; Fortunato L; Trotta G
    Minerva Stomatol; 1989 Jul; 38(7):743-52. PubMed ID: 2677649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Microtensile bond strength to ground enamel by glass-ionomers, resin-modified glass-ionomers, and resin composites used as pit and fissure sealants.
    Papacchini F; Goracci C; Sadek FT; Monticelli F; Garcia-Godoy F; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2005 Jul; 33(6):459-67. PubMed ID: 15935265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Microleakage evaluation of pit and fissure sealants done with different procedures, materials, and laser after invasive technique.
    do Rego MA; de Araujo MA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 24(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 10709546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Clinical evaluation of a nanofilled fissure sealant placed with different adhesive systems: 24-month results.
    Yazici AR; Karaman E; Baseren M; Tuncer D; Yazici E; Unlüer S
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(6):642-7. PubMed ID: 19953772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Use of one-bottle adhesive as an intermediate bonding layer to reduce sealant microleakage on saliva-contaminated enamel.
    Hebling J; Feigal RJ
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):187-91. PubMed ID: 11763928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Clinical evaluation of an adhesive used as a fissure sealant.
    Grande RH; de Lima AC; Rodrigues Filho LE; Witzel MF
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):167-70. PubMed ID: 11763924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Frequency of remnants of sealants left behind in pits and fissures of occlusal surfaces after 2 and 3 years.
    Hu X; Zhang W; Fan M; Mulder J; Frencken JE
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jan; 21(1):143-149. PubMed ID: 26961522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparative analysis of tensile bond strength of two new fissure sealants using invasive and non-invasive techniques.
    Dhar V; Tandon S
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1999 Jun; 17(2):49-54. PubMed ID: 10863491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Clinical/Photographic/Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis of Pit and Fissure Sealants After 22 Years: A Case Series.
    Sundfeld D; Machado LS; Franco LM; Salomão FM; Pini N; Sundefeld M; Pfeifer CS; Sundfeld RH
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(1):10-18. PubMed ID: 27723424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A comparison of Fluroshield with Delton fissure sealant: four year results.
    Lygidakis NA; Oulis KI
    Pediatr Dent; 1999; 21(7):429-31. PubMed ID: 10633516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effect of sealant viscosity on the penetration of resin into etched human enamel.
    Irinoda Y; Matsumura Y; Kito H; Nakano T; Toyama T; Nakagaki H; Tsuchiya T
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):274-82. PubMed ID: 11203831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Pit and fissure sealant application using a drying agent.
    Rix AM; Sams DR; Dickinson GL; Adair SM; Russell CM; Hoyle SL
    Am J Dent; 1994 Jun; 7(3):131-3. PubMed ID: 7993599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.