These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7548254)

  • 1. [Estimating patient dose in computerized tomography].
    Lemke AJ; Neumann K; Hosten N; Schweiger U; Felix R
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Jul; 5(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 7548254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Estimating patient dose in radiologic examinations using conversion factors].
    Neumann K; Lemke AJ; Hosten N; Keske U
    Radiologe; 1995 Mar; 35(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 7761593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of radiation exposure on a dual-source computed tomography-scanner performing coronary computed tomography-angiography.
    Kirchhoff S; Herzog P; Johnson T; Böhm H; Nikolaou K; Reiser MF; Becker CH
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jun; 74(3):e181-5. PubMed ID: 19608362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effective doses to patients from CT acquisitions on the GE Infinia Hawkeye: a comparison of calculation methods.
    Sawyer LJ; Starritt HC; Hiscock SC; Evans MJ
    Nucl Med Commun; 2008 Feb; 29(2):144-9. PubMed ID: 18094636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
    DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methods of determining the effective dose in dental radiology.
    Thilander-Klang A; Helmrot E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):306-9. PubMed ID: 20211918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 2007 recommendations of the ICRP change basis for estimation of the effective dose: what is the impact on radiation dose assessment of patient and personnel?
    Boetticher Hv; Lachmund J; Looe HK; Hoffmann W; Poppe B
    Rofo; 2008 May; 180(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 18438741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effective dose determination using an anthropomorphic phantom and metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for clinical adult body multidetector array computed tomography protocols.
    Hurwitz LM; Yoshizumi TT; Goodman PC; Frush DP; Nguyen G; Toncheva G; Lowry C
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(4):544-9. PubMed ID: 17882029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient dose estimation for multi-detector-row CT examinations.
    Nishizawa K; Mori S; Ohno M; Yanagawa N; Yoshida T; Akahane K; Iwai K; Wada S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 17595212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating radiation doses from multidetector CT using Monte Carlo simulations: effects of different size voxelized patient models on magnitudes of organ and effective dose.
    DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; Zankl M; Angel E; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 May; 52(9):2583-97. PubMed ID: 17440254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monte Carlo simulation of a computed tomography x-ray tube.
    Bazalova M; Verhaegen F
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(19):5945-55. PubMed ID: 17881811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiation doses to patients during selected CT procedures at four hospitals in Tanzania.
    Muhogora WE; Nyanda AM; Ngoye WM; Shao D
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):461-7. PubMed ID: 16165335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Medical exposure from computed tomographic examination -a recommendation of dosimetry by film method-].
    Yasutomo M; Yagi H
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(2):88-97. PubMed ID: 12766285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Update of diagnostic medical and dental x-ray exposures in Romania.
    Sorop I; Mossang D; Iacob MR; Dadulescu E; Iacob O
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Dec; 28(4):563-71. PubMed ID: 19029586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated effective dose estimation in CT.
    García MS; Cameán MP; Busto RL; Vega VL; Sueiro JM; Martínez CO; del Río JR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jan; 138(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 19783556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiation exposure of patients undergoing whole-body dual-modality 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations.
    Brix G; Lechel U; Glatting G; Ziegler SI; Münzing W; Müller SP; Beyer T
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Apr; 46(4):608-13. PubMed ID: 15809483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PET/CT and SPECT/CT dosimetry in children: the challenge to the pediatric imager.
    Gelfand MJ; Lemen LC
    Semin Nucl Med; 2007 Sep; 37(5):391-8. PubMed ID: 17707244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Software for the estimation of organ equivalent and effective doses from diagnostic radiology procedures.
    Osei EK; Barnett R
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Sep; 29(3):361-76. PubMed ID: 19690363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CT dose: how to measure, how to reduce.
    McCollough CH
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):508-17. PubMed ID: 18849683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A direct method for air kerma-length product measurement in CT for verification of dose display calibrations.
    Merimaa K; Järvinen H; Kortesniemi M; Karppinen J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Aug; 140(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 20356958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.