118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7548448)
1. Performance of a direct, immunoseparation based LDL-cholesterol method compared to Friedewald calculation and a polyvinyl sulphate precipitation method.
Cobbaert C; Broodman I; Swart GR; Hoogerbrugge N
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1995 Jul; 33(7):417-24. PubMed ID: 7548448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analytical performance of a direct assay for LDL-cholesterol.
Smets EM; Péquériaux NC; Blaton V; Goldschmidt HM
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2001 Mar; 39(3):270-80. PubMed ID: 11350026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accurate direct determination of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol using an immunoseparation reagent and enzymatic cholesterol assay.
Pisani T; Gebski CP; Leary ET; Warnick GR; Ollington JF
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Dec; 119(12):1127-35. PubMed ID: 7503661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of five methods for determining low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in hemodialysis patients(1).
Bairaktari E; Elisaf M; Tzallas C; Karabina SA; Tselepis AD; Siamopoulos KC; Tsolas O
Clin Biochem; 2001 Nov; 34(8):593-602. PubMed ID: 11849617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analytical performance of a direct assay for LDL-cholesterol: a comparative assessment versus Friedewald's formula.
Türkalp I; Cil Z; Ozkazanç D
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2005 Mar; 5(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 15755695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement of plasma LDL cholesterol in patients with diabetes.
Whiting MJ; Shephard MD; Tallis GA
Diabetes Care; 1997 Jan; 20(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 9028686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analytical performance and clinical efficacy of three routine procedures for LDL cholesterol measurement compared with the ultracentrifugation-dextran sulfate-Mg(2+) method.
Nauck M; Rifai N
Clin Chim Acta; 2000 Apr; 294(1-2):77-92. PubMed ID: 10727675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is the determination of LDL cholesterol according to Friedewald accurate in CAPD and HD patients?
Nauck M; Krämer-Guth A; Bartens W; März W; Wieland H; Wanner C
Clin Nephrol; 1996 Nov; 46(5):319-25. PubMed ID: 8953121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the Cholestech L.D.X. desktop analyser for cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and triacylglycerols in heparinized venous blood.
Cobbaert C; Boerma GJ; Lindemans J
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1994 May; 32(5):391-4. PubMed ID: 8086524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Direct measurement of LDL-C in children: performance of two surfactant-based methods in a general pediatric population.
Yu HH; Markowitz R; De Ferranti SD; Neufeld EJ; Farrow G; Bernstein HH; Rifai N
Clin Biochem; 2000 Mar; 33(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 10751585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analytical performance and clinical utility of a direct LDL-cholesterol assay in a hyperlipidemic pediatric population.
Harris N; Neufeld EJ; Newburger JW; Ticho B; Baker A; Ginsburg GS; Rimm E; Rifai N
Clin Chem; 1996 Aug; 42(8 Pt 1):1182-8. PubMed ID: 8697574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of four homogeneous direct methods for LDL-cholesterol.
Miller WG; Waymack PP; Anderson FP; Ethridge SF; Jayne EC
Clin Chem; 2002 Mar; 48(3):489-98. PubMed ID: 11861439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of methods for measurement of apolipoprotein B and cholesterol in low-density lipoproteins.
Vrga L; Contacos C; Li SC; Sullivan DR
Clin Chem; 1997 Feb; 43(2):390-3. PubMed ID: 9023145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of a new method for the direct and simultaneous assessment of LDL- and HDL-cholesterol with ultracentrifugation and established methods.
Benlian P; Cansier C; Hennache G; Khallouf O; Bayer P; Duron F; Carrat F; Couderc R; Chazouillères O; Bardet J; Bouchard P; Poupon R; Masliah J; Béréziat G
Clin Chem; 2000 Apr; 46(4):493-505. PubMed ID: 10759473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contents of apolipoprotein A-I, A-II and B of the human serum fractions for high-density and low-density lipoproteins prepared by common precipitation methods.
Väisänen S; Gävert J; Julkunen A; Voutilainen E; Penttilä I
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1992 Dec; 52(8):853-62. PubMed ID: 1488623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Precipitation of LDL with sulphopolyanions: a comparison of two methods for LDL cholesterol determination.
Assmann G; Jabs HU; Nolte W; Schriewer H
J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1984 Nov; 22(11):781-5. PubMed ID: 6527097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of measured LDL cholesterol with calculated LDL-cholesterol using the Friedewald and Martin-Hopkins formulae in diabetic adults at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital/NHLS Laboratory.
Dintshi M; Kone N; Khoza S
PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0277981. PubMed ID: 36516155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of LDL cholesterol concentrations by Friedewald calculation and direct measurement in relation to cardiovascular events in 27,331 women.
Mora S; Rifai N; Buring JE; Ridker PM
Clin Chem; 2009 May; 55(5):888-94. PubMed ID: 19395440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation and clinical application of a direct low-density lipoprotein cholesterol assay in normolipidemic and hyperlipidemic adults.
Yu HH; Ginsburg GS; Harris N; Rifai N
Am J Cardiol; 1997 Nov; 80(10):1295-9. PubMed ID: 9388101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Immunoseparation method for measuring low-density lipoprotein cholesterol directly from serum evaluated.
McNamara JR; Cole TG; Contois JH; Ferguson CA; Ordovas JM; Schaefer EJ
Clin Chem; 1995 Feb; 41(2):232-40. PubMed ID: 7874777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
