These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7548594)
1. Effect of choice of medium on the results of in vitro susceptibility testing of eight antibiotics against the Bacteroides fragilis group. Hecht DW; Lederer L Clin Infect Dis; 1995 Jun; 20 Suppl 2():S346-9. PubMed ID: 7548594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of EUCAST disk diffusion method for susceptibility testing of the Bacteroides fragilis group isolates. Nagy E; Justesen US; Eitel Z; Urbán E; Anaerobe; 2015 Feb; 31():65-71. PubMed ID: 25464140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Susceptibility results for the Bacteroides fragilis group: comparison of the broth microdilution and agar dilution methods. Hecht DW; Lederer L; Osmolski JR Clin Infect Dis; 1995 Jun; 20 Suppl 2():S342-5. PubMed ID: 7548593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group to 10 antibiotics. Results of 4 laboratories in Austria]. Mittermayer H; Rotter M; Riezinger F; Thiel W; Stanek G Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A; 1986 Nov; 262(4):500-11. PubMed ID: 3799095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Susceptibility trends of Bacteroides fragilis group isolates from Buenos Aires, Argentina. Fernández Canigia L; Castello L; Di Martino A; Greco G; Legaria MC; Litterio M; Predari SC; Rollet R; Rossetti A; Carloni G; Sarchi MI; Bianchini H Rev Argent Microbiol; 2007; 39(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 17987852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of inoculum size and medium on activity of seven antimicrobial agents against Bacteroides fragilis strains. Wexler HM; Reeves D; Finegold SM Clin Ther; 1989; 11(6):828-33. PubMed ID: 2611824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of different statistical methodologies on the evaluation of the in-vitro MICs for Bacteroides fragilis of selected cephalosporins and cephamycins. White RL; Kays MB; Friedrich LV; Del Bene VE J Antimicrob Chemother; 1993 Jan; 31(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 8444675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In-vitro susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group and the inoculum effect of newer beta-lactam antibiotics on this group of organisms. Jacobus NV; Cuchural GJ; Tally FP J Antimicrob Chemother; 1989 Nov; 24(5):675-82. PubMed ID: 2599992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative in vitro antimicrobial susceptibilities of a special panel of 74 Bacteroides fragilis group isolates in Wilkins-Chalgren agar with and without sheep blood. Gill CJ; Shungu DL; Ponticas S Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1989 Mar; 33(3):394-5. PubMed ID: 2729933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Major methodology-dependent discordant susceptibility results for Bacteroides fragilis group isolates but not other anaerobes. Aldridge KE; Schiro DD Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1994 Nov; 20(3):135-42. PubMed ID: 7874880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variation in susceptibility patterns of species within the Bacteroides fragilis group. Hansen SL Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1980 Apr; 17(4):686-90. PubMed ID: 7396458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of Bacteroides fragilis and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron in Japan from 1990 to 1992. Tanaka-Bandoh K; Kato N; Watanabe K; Ueno K Clin Infect Dis; 1995 Jun; 20 Suppl 2():S352-5. PubMed ID: 7548596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of trends in antimicrobial resistance patterns among clinical isolates of Bacteroides fragilis group species from 1990 to 1994. Snydman DR; McDermott L; Cuchural GJ; Hecht DW; Iannini PB; Harrell LJ; Jenkins SG; O'Keefe JP; Pierson CL; Rihs JD; Yu VL; Finegold SM; Gorbach SL Clin Infect Dis; 1996 Dec; 23 Suppl 1():S54-65. PubMed ID: 8953108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro activity of tigecycline against Bacteroides species. Betriu C; Culebras E; Gómez M; Rodríguez-Avial I; Picazo JJ J Antimicrob Chemother; 2005 Aug; 56(2):349-52. PubMed ID: 15951353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparative effect of apalcillin and other beta-lactam antibiotics against the Bacteroides fragilis group]. Dusart G; Simeon de Buochberg M; Zuccarelli M; Attisso MA; Willemin C Pathol Biol (Paris); 1989 Jun; 37(5 Pt 2):523-7. PubMed ID: 2797878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the E-test for susceptibility testing of the Bacteroides fragilis group. Danish study group. Bremmelgaard A; Jansen JE; Justesen T; Gottschau A APMIS; 1994 Jun; 102(6):446-50. PubMed ID: 8068304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the E test (PDM epsilometer) and broth microdilution susceptibility tests for members of the Bacteroides fragilis group. Murray PR; Niles AC Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1991; 14(6):501-5. PubMed ID: 1802537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In-vitro study of the susceptibility of cefoxitin/cefotetan resistant Bacteroides fragilis group strains to various other antimicrobial agents. Aldridge KE; Henderberg A; Sanders CV J Antimicrob Chemother; 1990 Sep; 26(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 2228826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Media- and method-dependent variation in MIC values of ceftizoxime for clinical isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group. Wexler HM; Finegold SM Clin Ther; 1990; 12 Suppl C():13-24. PubMed ID: 2390771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical isolates of Bacteroides fragilis group organisms recovered from 2009 to 2012 in a Korean hospital. Yim J; Lee Y; Kim M; Seo YH; Kim WH; Yong D; Jeong SH; Lee K; Chong Y Ann Lab Med; 2015 Jan; 35(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 25553287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]