These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Performance of linkage analysis under misclassification error when the genetic model is unknown. Martinez M; Khlat M; Leboyer M; Clerget-Darpoux F Genet Epidemiol; 1989; 6(1):253-8. PubMed ID: 2731714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maximum-Likelihood-Binomial method for genetic model-free linkage analysis of quantitative traits in sibships. Alcaïs A; Abel L Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17(2):102-17. PubMed ID: 10414555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A note on the asymptotic properties of affected-sib-pair linkage tests. Wang K Ann Hum Genet; 2004 Jul; 68(Pt 4):367-75. PubMed ID: 15225162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Likelihood-based inference for the genetic relative risk based on affected-sibling-pair marker data. McKnight B; Tierney C; McGorray SP; Day NE Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):426-43. PubMed ID: 9629637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computation of the posterior probability of linkage using 'high effect' genetic model priors. Logue MW; Li Y Hum Hered; 2008; 66(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 18223315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Alternative test for linkage between two loci. Cleves MA; Elston RC Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(2):117-31. PubMed ID: 9129958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Where is the likelihood ratio test powerful for detecting two component normal mixtures? Mendell NR; Finch SJ; Thode HC Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):907-15. PubMed ID: 8241377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship uncertainty linkage statistics (RULS): affected relative pair statistics that model relationship uncertainty. Ray A; Weeks DE Genet Epidemiol; 2008 May; 32(4):313-24. PubMed ID: 18205206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantifying genomic imprinting in the presence of linkage. Vincent Q; Alcaïs A; Alter A; Schurr E; Abel L Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1071-80. PubMed ID: 17156281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ASP--a simulation-based power calculator for genetic linkage studies of qualitative traits, using sib-pairs. Krawczak M Hum Genet; 2001 Dec; 109(6):675-7. PubMed ID: 11810280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of four sib-pair linkage methods for analyzing sibships with more than two affecteds: interest of the binomial maximum likelihood approach. Abel L; Alcais A; Mallet A Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(4):371-90. PubMed ID: 9671987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Affected-sib-pair test for linkage based on constraints for identical-by-descent distributions corresponding to disease models with imprinting. Knapp M; Strauch K Genet Epidemiol; 2004 May; 26(4):273-85. PubMed ID: 15095387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Linkage information and bias in the presence of interference. Bishop DT; Thompson EA Genet Epidemiol; 1988; 5(2):107-19. PubMed ID: 3402723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Power to detect linkage with heterogeneity in samples of small nuclear families. Levinson DF Am J Med Genet; 1993 Jul; 48(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 8362931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distribution of the admixture test for the detection of linkage under heterogeneity. Faraway JJ Genet Epidemiol; 1993; 10(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 8472936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Percentiles of the null distribution of 2 maximum lod score tests. Ulgen A; Yoo YJ; Gordon D; Finch SJ; Mendell NR Hum Hered; 2004; 57(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 15133311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]