These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7548688)

  • 21. Order-restricted tests for stratified comparisons of binomial proportions.
    Agresti A; Coull BA
    Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):1103-11. PubMed ID: 8805770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Analysis of overdispersed count data by mixtures of Poisson variables and Poisson processes.
    Hougaard P; Lee ML; Whitmore GA
    Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1225-38. PubMed ID: 9423246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. On the asymptotic behavior of the estimate of the recombination fraction under the null hypothesis of no linkage when the model is misspecified.
    Williamson JA; Amos CI
    Genet Epidemiol; 1990; 7(5):309-18. PubMed ID: 2253866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Empirical significance values for linkage analysis: trait simulation using posterior model distributions from MCMC oligogenic segregation analysis.
    Igo RP; Wijsman EM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 32(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 17849492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The impact of population admixture on traditional linkage analysis.
    Barnholtz-Sloan JS; de Andrade M; Chakraborty R
    Ethn Dis; 2001; 11(3):519-31. PubMed ID: 11572417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Multipoint linkage detection in the presence of heterogeneity.
    Chiu YF; Liang KY; Beaty TH
    Biostatistics; 2002 Jun; 3(2):195-211. PubMed ID: 12933613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Joint segregation and linkage analysis of a quantitative trait compared to separate analyses.
    Gauderman WJ; Faucett CL; Morrison JL; Carpenter CL
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):993-8. PubMed ID: 9433613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Tree-based recursive partitioning methods for subdividing sibpairs into relatively more homogeneous subgroups.
    Shannon WD; Province MA; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Apr; 20(3):293-306. PubMed ID: 11255239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Guess LOD approach: sufficient conditions for robustness.
    Williamson JA; Amos CI
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(2):163-76. PubMed ID: 7607416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Gene-dropping vs. empirical variance estimation for allele-sharing linkage statistics.
    Jung J; Weeks DE; Feingold E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):652-65. PubMed ID: 16917920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A score test for linkage analysis of ordinal traits based on IBD sharing.
    Feng R; Zhang H
    Biostatistics; 2008 Jan; 9(1):114-27. PubMed ID: 17519391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci for traits with ordinal distributions.
    Hackett CA; Weller JI
    Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1252-63. PubMed ID: 8589221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Robust transmission regression models for linkage and association.
    Schaid DJ; Rowland CM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000; 19 Suppl 1():S78-84. PubMed ID: 11055374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Likelihood ratio testing of variance components in the linear mixed-effects model using restricted maximum likelihood.
    Morrell CH
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1560-8. PubMed ID: 9883552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prior segregation analysis and the power to detect linkage.
    Atwood LD; Slifer SH
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):755-60. PubMed ID: 9433573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Incorporation of covariates in multipoint model-free linkage analysis of binary traits: how important are unaffecteds?
    Alcaïs A; Abel L
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Aug; 9(8):613-20. PubMed ID: 11528507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of tests of the difference in the proportion of patients who are cured.
    Sposto R; Sather HN; Baker SA
    Biometrics; 1992 Mar; 48(1):87-99. PubMed ID: 1581495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Testing hypotheses about interclass correlations from familial data.
    Konishi S
    Biometrics; 1985 Mar; 41(1):167-76. PubMed ID: 4005373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of path analysis through computer simulation: effect of incorrectly assuming independent distribution of familial correlations.
    McGue M; Wette R; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1984; 1(3):255-69. PubMed ID: 6544240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A combined test of linkage heterogeneity.
    Goldstein DR
    Am J Hum Genet; 1994 Oct; 55(4):841-8. PubMed ID: 7942861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.