These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7548930)

  • 1. Should the audiometric database analysis method (draft ANSI S12.13-1991) for evaluating the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs be accepted as a US national standard?
    Adera T; Gullickson GM; Helfer T; Wang L; Gardner JW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1995 Jul; 6(4):302-10. PubMed ID: 7548930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of audiometric threshold step size on proposed ANSI S12.13 outcomes for characterizing hearing conservation program effectiveness.
    Simpson TH; Stewart M; Kaltenbach JA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Jul; 4(4):258-63. PubMed ID: 8369543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of pre-existing hearing loss on proposed ANSI S12.13 outcomes for characterizing hearing conservation program effectiveness: follow-up investigation.
    Simpson TH; Amos N; Rintelmann WF
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1998 Apr; 9(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 9564673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of pre-existing hearing loss and gender on proposed ANSI S12.13 outcomes for characterizing hearing conservation program effectiveness: preliminary investigation.
    Amos NE; Simpson TH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1995 Nov; 6(6):407-13. PubMed ID: 8580500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of the proposed Draft American National Standard method for evaluating the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs.
    Adera T; Donahue AM; Malit BD; Gaydos JC
    J Occup Med; 1993 Jun; 35(6):568-73. PubMed ID: 8331436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using audiometric data base analysis.
    Royster JD; Royster LH
    J Occup Med; 1986 Oct; 28(10):1055-68. PubMed ID: 3772540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Audiometric referral criteria for industrial hearing conservation programs.
    Simpson TH; Stewart M; Blakley BW
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1995 Apr; 121(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 7702814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hearing conservation programs (HCPs): the effectiveness of one company's HCP in a 12-hr work shift environment.
    Reynolds JL; Royster LH; Pearson RG
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 Aug; 51(8):437-46. PubMed ID: 2392973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early indicators of hearing conservation program performance.
    Simpson TH; Stewart M; Kaltenbach JA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1994 Sep; 5(5):300-6. PubMed ID: 7987019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-Effective Hearing Conservation: Regulatory and Research Priorities.
    Dobie RA
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):621-630. PubMed ID: 29251690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The contribution of focus groups in the evaluation of hearing conservation program (HCP) effectiveness.
    Prince MM; Colligan MJ; Stephenson CM; Bischoff BJ
    J Safety Res; 2004; 35(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 14992850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Costs and effectiveness of hearing conservation programs at 14 US metal manufacturing facilities.
    Sayler SK; Rabinowitz PM; Cantley LF; Galusha D; Neitzel RL
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Feb; 57(sup1):S3-S11. PubMed ID: 29216778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes analysis for hearing conservation programs.
    Helfer TM; Shields AR; Gates KE
    Am J Audiol; 2000 Dec; 9(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 11200195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An epidemiologic method for assessing the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs using audiometric data.
    Adera T; Donahue AM; Malit BD; Gaydos JC
    Mil Med; 1993 Nov; 158(11):698-701. PubMed ID: 8284053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Safety of audiology direct access for medicare patients complaining of impaired hearing.
    Zapala DA; Stamper GC; Shelfer JS; Walker DA; Karatayli-Ozgursoy S; Ozgursoy OB; Hawkins DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jun; 21(6):365-79. PubMed ID: 20701834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of industrial hearing conservation programs: a review and analysis.
    Melnick W
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 Jul; 45(7):459-67. PubMed ID: 6464993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effectiveness of the Navy's Hearing Conservation Program.
    Wolgemuth KS; Luttrell WE; Kamhi AG; Wark DJ
    Mil Med; 1995 May; 160(5):219-22. PubMed ID: 7659208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of comparison populations for evaluating the effectiveness of hearing loss prevention programs.
    Adera T; Amir C; Anderson L
    AIHAJ; 2000; 61(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 10772609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Industrial hearing conservation.
    Megerson SC
    ASHA; 1993 Nov; 35(11):49-50. PubMed ID: 8292078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models.
    Davis A; Smith P; Ferguson M; Stephens D; Gianopoulos I
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Oct; 11(42):1-294. PubMed ID: 17927921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.