These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7548930)

  • 21. Industrial hearing conservation.
    Megerson SC
    ASHA; 1993 Nov; 35(11):49-50. PubMed ID: 8292078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models.
    Davis A; Smith P; Ferguson M; Stephens D; Gianopoulos I
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Oct; 11(42):1-294. PubMed ID: 17927921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hearing Thresholds, Minimum Response Levels, and Cross-Check Measures in Pediatric Audiology.
    Norrix LW
    Am J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 24(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 25760246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. High-frequency audibility: the effects of audiometric configuration, stimulus type, and device.
    Kimlinger C; McCreery R; Lewis D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):128-37. PubMed ID: 25690773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Communication outcomes in audiologic reporting.
    Ramachandran V; Lewis JD; Mosstaghimi-Tehrani M; Stach BA; Yaremchuk KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Apr; 22(4):231-41. PubMed ID: 21586258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ambient noise levels in mobile audiometric testing facilities: compliance with industry standards.
    Lankford JE; Perrone DC; Thunder TD
    AAOHN J; 1999 Apr; 47(4):163-7. PubMed ID: 10418346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part III. The validity of using subject-fit data.
    Berger EH; Franks JR; Behar A; Casali JG; Dixon-Ernst C; Kieper RW; Merry CJ; Mozo BT; Nixon CW; Ohlin D; Royster JD; Royster LH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):665-72. PubMed ID: 9479749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Noise-induced hearing loss among U.S. Air Force cryptolinguists.
    Ritter DC; Perkins JL
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2001 Jun; 72(6):546-52. PubMed ID: 11398819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Inter-laboratory comparison of three earplug fit-test systems.
    Byrne DC; Murphy WJ; Krieg EF; Ghent RM; Michael KL; Stefanson EW; Ahroon WA
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Apr; 14(4):294-305. PubMed ID: 27786602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Public awareness of audiology, hearing and hearing health in the Limpopo Province, South Africa.
    Joubert K; Sebothoma B; Kgare KS
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2017 Sep; 64(1):e1-e9. PubMed ID: 29041791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Overlap and Nonoverlap Between the ICF Core Sets for Hearing Loss and Otology and Audiology Intake Documentation.
    van Leeuwen LM; Merkus P; Pronk M; van der Torn M; Maré M; Goverts ST; Kramer SE
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):103-116. PubMed ID: 27556527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of an earphone-support device for measuring earplug attenuation.
    Dolan TG; Maurer JF; Dickinson LG
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1993 Feb; 54(2):45-50. PubMed ID: 8452096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Methodological issues when comparing hearing thresholds of a group with population standards: the case of the ferry engineers.
    Dobie RA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):526-37. PubMed ID: 16957502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of criteria for significant threshold shift in workplace hearing conservation programs.
    Daniell WE; Stover BD; Takaro TK
    J Occup Environ Med; 2003 Mar; 45(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 12661187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Personality, hearing problems, and amplification characteristics: contributions to self-report hearing aid outcomes.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Gray GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):141-62. PubMed ID: 17496667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prevalence of hearing impairment by gender and audiometric configuration: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2004) and the Keokuk County Rural Health Study (1994-1998).
    Ciletti L; Flamme GA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Oct; 19(9):672-85. PubMed ID: 19418707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How Can Public Health Approaches and Perspectives Advance Hearing Health Care?
    Reavis KM; Tremblay KL; Saunders G
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):376-80. PubMed ID: 27232072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Changes over time in audiometric thresholds in a group of automobile stamping and assembly workers with a hearing conservation program.
    Brink LL; Talbott EO; Burks JA; Palmer CV
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2002; 63(4):482-7. PubMed ID: 12486782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Overview of audiology in Brazil: state of the art.
    Russo IC
    Audiology; 2000; 39(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 10963441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Response Letter to the McCreery et al (2016) Article "Stability of Audiometric Thresholds for Children with Hearing Aids Applying the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Implications for Safety".
    Johnson E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):778-779. PubMed ID: 27718353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.