These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7548931)

  • 1. Revised Communication Self-assessment Scale Inventory for Deaf Adults (CSDA).
    Kaplan H; Bally SJ; Brandt F
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1995 Jul; 6(4):311-29. PubMed ID: 7548931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Communication Self-Assessment Scale Inventory for Deaf Adults.
    Kaplan H; Bally SJ; Brandt F
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1991 Jul; 2(3):164-82. PubMed ID: 1768885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Communication Scale for Older Adults (CSOA).
    Kaplan H; Bally S; Brandt F; Busacco D; Pray J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1997 Jun; 8(3):203-17. PubMed ID: 9188077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of a self-report tool to evaluate hearing aid outcomes among Chinese speakers.
    Wong LL; Hang N
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Aug; 57(4):1548-63. PubMed ID: 24686556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of the Profile of Hearing Aid Performance (PHAP).
    Cox RM; Gilmore C
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):343-57. PubMed ID: 2359275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of communication mode on the development of phonemic awareness in prelingually deaf students.
    Miller P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Oct; 40(5):1151-63. PubMed ID: 9328886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Communication skills of deaf and hard-of-hearing college students: Objective measures and self-assessment.
    Spencer LJ; Marschark M; Machmer E; Durkin A; Borgna G; Convertino C
    J Commun Disord; 2018; 75():13-24. PubMed ID: 29957560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Hearing Impairment Impact-Significant Other Profile (HII-SOP): a tool to measure hearing loss-related quality of life in spouses of people with hearing loss.
    Preminger JE; Meeks S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):807-23. PubMed ID: 23169197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Receptive language as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome for prelingually deaf adults.
    Rousset A; Dowell R; Leigh J
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S24-30. PubMed ID: 27160793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors Affecting Speech Perception Improvement Post Implantation in Congenitally Deaf Adults.
    O'Gara SJ; Cullington HE; Grasmeder ML; Adamou M; Matthews ES
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):671-679. PubMed ID: 27779517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech perception in congenitally, pre-lingually and post-lingually deaf children expressed in an equivalent hearing loss value.
    Rotteveel LJ; Snik AF; Vermeulen AM; Cremers CW; Mylanus EA
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 33(6):560-9. PubMed ID: 19126130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech perception performance of children with a cochlear implant compared to that of children with conventional hearing aids. II. Results of prelingually deaf children.
    Snik AF; Vermeulen AM; Geelen CP; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 Sep; 117(5):755-9. PubMed ID: 9349876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The French adaptation of the STAXI-2, C.D. Spielberger's State-trait anger expression inventory].
    Borteyrou X; Bruchon-Schweitzer M; Spielberger CD
    Encephale; 2008 Jun; 34(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 18558145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting Performance and Non-Use in Prelingually Deaf and Late-Implanted Cochlear Implant Users.
    Lammers MJW; Versnel H; Topsakal V; van Zanten GA; Grolman W
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jul; 39(6):e436-e442. PubMed ID: 29794686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the bone anchored hearing aid implantable hearing device with contralateral routing of offside signal amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness.
    Niparko JK; Cox KM; Lustig LR
    Otol Neurotol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 12544032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functional differentiation of the auditory association area in prelingually deaf subjects.
    Hirano S; Naito Y; Kojima H; Honjo I; Inoue M; Shoji K; Tateya I; Fujiki N; Nishizawa S; Konishi J
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2000 Oct; 27(4):303-10. PubMed ID: 10996488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deaf children's spoken language output with a hearing peer and with a hearing mother.
    Niver JM; Schery TK
    Am Ann Deaf; 1994 Mar; 139(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 8037083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of speech perception in pediatric CLARION cochlear implant and hearing aid users.
    Svirsky MA; Meyer TA
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1999 Apr; 177():104-9. PubMed ID: 10214812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of communication strategies for deaf or hard of hearing workers in group settings.
    Haynes S
    Work; 2014; 48(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 23531576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychometric properties of the self-efficacy for situational communication management questionnaire (SESMQ).
    Jennings MB; Cheesman MF; Laplante-Lévesque A
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):221-9. PubMed ID: 24556967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.