These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Real-time Fourier velocity encoding: an in vivo evaluation. Macgowan CK; Kellenberger CJ; Detsky JS; Roman K; Yoo SJ J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Mar; 21(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15723365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Zero filled partial fourier phase contrast MR imaging: in vitro and in vivo assessment. Szarf G; Dori Y; Rettmann D; Tekes A; Nasir K; Amado L; Foo TK; Bluemke DA J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jan; 23(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 16315213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MR measurement and numerical simulation of steady flow in an end-to-side anastomosis model. Steinman DA; Frayne R; Zhang XD; Rutt BK; Ethier CR J Biomech; 1996 Apr; 29(4):537-42. PubMed ID: 8964783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Regularization of flow streamlines in multislice phase-contrast MR imaging. Fatouraee N; Amini AA IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Jun; 22(6):699-709. PubMed ID: 12872945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Flow quantification using fast cine phase-contrast MR imaging, conventional cine phase-contrast MR imaging, and Doppler sonography: in vitro and in vivo validation. Lee VS; Spritzer CE; Carroll BA; Pool LG; Bernstein MA; Heinle SK; MacFall JR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1125-31. PubMed ID: 9308476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The accuracy of magnetic resonance phase velocity measurements in stenotic flow. Siegel JM; Oshinski JN; Pettigrew RI; Ku DN J Biomech; 1996 Dec; 29(12):1665-72. PubMed ID: 8945670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Complex flow patterns in a real-size intracranial aneurysm phantom: phase contrast MRI compared with particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics. van Ooij P; Guédon A; Poelma C; Schneiders J; Rutten MC; Marquering HA; Majoie CB; VanBavel E; Nederveen AJ NMR Biomed; 2012 Jan; 25(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 21480417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of Spatial Resolution in Three-dimensional Cine Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging on the Accuracy of Hemodynamic Analysis. Fukuyama A; Isoda H; Morita K; Mori M; Watanabe T; Ishiguro K; Komori Y; Kosugi T Magn Reson Med Sci; 2017 Oct; 16(4):311-316. PubMed ID: 28132996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatial factors for quantifying constant flow velocity in a small tube phantom: comparison of phase-contrast cine-magnetic resonance imaging and the intraluminal Doppler guidewire method. Machida H; Komori Y; Ueno E; Shen Y; Hirata M; Kojima S; Morita S; Sato M; Okazaki T Jpn J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 27(9):335-41. PubMed ID: 19943143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Velocity and flow quantitation in the superior sagittal sinus with ungated and cine (gated) phase-contrast MR imaging. Jordan JE; Pelc NJ; Enzmann DR J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 8148552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative velocity investigations in cerebral arteries and aneurysms: 3D phase-contrast MR angiography, laser Doppler velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics. Hollnagel DI; Summers PE; Poulikakos D; Kollias SS NMR Biomed; 2009 Oct; 22(8):795-808. PubMed ID: 19412933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mapping mean and fluctuating velocities by Bayesian multipoint MR velocity encoding-validation against 3D particle tracking velocimetry. Knobloch V; Binter C; Gülan U; Sigfridsson A; Holzner M; Lüthi B; Kozerke S Magn Reson Med; 2014 Apr; 71(4):1405-15. PubMed ID: 23670993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of the Flow Velocity and Three-directional Velocity Profile Measured with Three-dimensional Cine Phase-contrast MR Imaging: Verification on Scanners from Different Manufacturers. Watanabe T; Isoda H; Fukuyama A; Takahashi M; Amano T; Takehara Y; Oishi N; Kawate M; Terada M; Kosugi T; Komori Y; Fukuma Y; Alley M Magn Reson Med Sci; 2019 Oct; 18(4):265-271. PubMed ID: 30828045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cardiac 4D phase-contrast CMR at 9.4 T using self-gated ultra-short echo time (UTE) imaging. Krämer M; Motaal AG; Herrmann KH; Löffler B; Reichenbach JR; Strijkers GJ; Hoerr V J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Mar; 19(1):39. PubMed ID: 28359292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]