These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7549629)

  • 21. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. Too much ado.
    Albert LA
    J Leg Med; 1991 Sep; 12(3):331-58. PubMed ID: 1748837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The legal status of consent obtained from families of adult patients to withhold or withdraw treatment.
    Areen J
    JAMA; 1987 Jul; 258(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 3599309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The legal status of consent to withhold treatment.
    JAMA; 1987 Nov; 258(19):2696-7. PubMed ID: 3669239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Paralyzed woman has right to die, a British judge rules.
    Hoge W
    N Y Times Web; 2002 Mar; ():A4. PubMed ID: 11982008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Equality for the elderly incompetent: a proposal for dignified death.
    Merritt TL
    Stanford Law Rev; 1987 Feb; 39(3):689-736. PubMed ID: 10281165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A collision of disparate forces may be reshaping American law.
    Stolberg SG
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Apr; ():A18. PubMed ID: 15838985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The legal bounds of physician conduct hastening death.
    Cantor NL; Thomas GC
    Buffalo Law Rev; 2000; 48(1):83-173. PubMed ID: 12715817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Letting vegetative patients die.
    Fergusson A
    BMJ; 1992 Dec; 305(6867):1506. PubMed ID: 1493424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Letting vegetative patients die.
    Andrews K
    BMJ; 1992 Dec; 305(6867):1506. PubMed ID: 1493423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A ''minor'' decision: right to die or manslaughter?
    Baumrucker SJ; Morris GM; Stolick M; Vandekieft G
    Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2010 Sep; 27(6):428-31. PubMed ID: 20693520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Legal implications of the Wendland case for end-of-life decision making.
    Eisenberg JB; Kelso JC
    West J Med; 2002 Mar; 176(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 11897738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Life-and-death decisions.
    Washington Post; 1985 Jan; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11646411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In the Matter of Elizabeth Visbeck: an alleged incompetent.
    Nimz MM
    Issues Law Med; 1987 Mar; 2(5):405-8. PubMed ID: 11644463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A right to die.
    McAdams AL
    BMJ; 1992 Mar; 304(6829):765-6. PubMed ID: 1571685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Courting the issues: decisions in Minnesota and Missouri.
    Hosp Ethics; 1991; 7(2):2-5. PubMed ID: 10109746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. No new law planned on mercy killing.
    Warden J
    BMJ; 1993 May; 306(6886):1150. PubMed ID: 11643130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Death and dying in Tennessee.
    McKenney EJ
    Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1977; 7(4):503-54. PubMed ID: 11663172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client.
    Harner SR
    Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(4):869-98. PubMed ID: 12186076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The right to die.
    Kirven G
    Ky Bench Bar; 1975 Jul; 39(3):16+. PubMed ID: 11664754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The unconstitutional treatment of Nancy Cruzan.
    Gasner MR
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1990; 7(Part 2):1-39. PubMed ID: 16044596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.