174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7549634)
21. Seeking harmony in discord.
Nicholson RH
Hastings Cent Rep; 1998; 28(1):7. PubMed ID: 9539041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Guidelines for local research ethics committees: distinguishing between patient and population research in the Multicentre Research Project.
Benster R; Pollock AM
Public Health; 1993 Jan; 107(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 8475241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ethical review of multi-centre research: a survey of local research ethics committees in the south Thames region.
Holley S; Foster C
J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1998; 32(3):238-41. PubMed ID: 9670151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Local research ethics committees. Widely differing responses to a national survey protocol.
Harries UJ; Fentem PH; Tuxworth W; Hoinville GW
J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1994; 28(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 8006869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Improving review of multi-centre trials.
Montgomery J
Bull Med Ethics; 1994 Feb; No. 95():19-22. PubMed ID: 11652725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Are ethical committees reliable?
Hotopf M; Wessely S; Noah N
J R Soc Med; 1995 Jan; 88(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 7884767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. One year on: LRECs & MRECs in the West Country: meeting report.
Ashcroft R
Bull Med Ethics; 1998 Nov; No. 143():8-11. PubMed ID: 11657621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Local research ethics committees. Local committees have strengths too.
Tunstall-Pedoe H
BMJ; 1995 Dec; 311(7019):1570-1. PubMed ID: 8520417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Ethical appraisal for multi-centre medical research.
Drury M
J Med Ethics; 1990 Sep; 16(3):148-9. PubMed ID: 2231641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. IRB review as a "cooling out" device.
Levine M; Lathrop VG
IRB; 1983; 5(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 11649522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Royal College calls for central research ethics committee.
Wise J
BMJ; 1996 Aug; 313(7052):251. PubMed ID: 11644798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Local research ethics committees. Oxford committee was concerned that trial might be unethical.
Talbot D; Reynolds DJ
BMJ; 1997 Nov; 315(7120):1464. PubMed ID: 9418109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Ethics committees. Wandsworth District Research Ethics Committee.
Sonneborn K; Collier J
Lancet; 1996 Mar; 347(9004):833-4. PubMed ID: 8622366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. LREC resigns unanimously.
Bull Med Ethics; 1997 May; No. 128():3-6. PubMed ID: 11655046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Performance of research ethics committees in Spain. A prospective study of 100 applications for clinical trial protocols on medicines.
Dal-RĂ© R; Espada J; Ortega R
J Med Ethics; 1999 Jun; 25(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 10390685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Ethical review of multi-centre research: a survey of multi-centre researchers in the South Thames region.
Foster C; Holley S
J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1998; 32(3):242-5. PubMed ID: 9670152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Transforming a personal inquiry into a research project: case study.
Pattullo EL
IRB; 1981 Apr; 3(4):5-6. PubMed ID: 11661945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Undergraduate research and the institutional review board: a mismatch or happy marriage?
Kallgren CA; Tauber RT
Teach Psychol; 1996 Feb; 23(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 11655063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The ethics of research on court-ordered evaluation and therapy for exhibitionism.
Murphy WD; Thomasma DC
IRB; 1981 Nov; 3(9):1-4. PubMed ID: 11649401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Ethics committees.
Godwin PG
Lancet; 1995 Apr; 345(8956):1051. PubMed ID: 7723520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]