These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7549820)

  • 1. Quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a comparison of methods of assessment.
    Lee-Han H; Cooke G; Boyd NF
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 1995 Aug; 4(4):285-92. PubMed ID: 7549820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.
    Boyd NF; Byng JW; Jong RA; Fishell EK; Little LE; Miller AB; Lockwood GA; Tritchler DL; Yaffe MJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1995 May; 87(9):670-5. PubMed ID: 7752271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mammographic signs of potential relevance to breast cancer risk: the agreement of radiologists' classification.
    Jong R; Fishell E; Little L; Lockwood G; Boyd NF
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 1996 Aug; 5(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 8894565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mammographic density and cancer detection: does digital imaging challenge our current understanding?
    Al Mousa DS; Mello-Thoms C; Ryan EA; Lee WB; Pietrzyk MW; Reed WM; Heard R; Poulos A; Tan J; Li Y; Brennan PC
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1377-85. PubMed ID: 25097013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship between mammographic and histological risk factors for breast cancer.
    Boyd NF; Jensen HM; Cooke G; Han HL
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1992 Aug; 84(15):1170-9. PubMed ID: 1635085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions.
    Nicholson BT; LoRusso AP; Smolkin M; Bovbjerg VE; Petroni GR; Harvey JA
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1143-9. PubMed ID: 16935726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities.
    Byng JW; Boyd NF; Fishell E; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Oct; 39(10):1629-38. PubMed ID: 15551535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproducibility of visual assessment on mammographic density.
    Gao J; Warren R; Warren-Forward H; Forbes JF
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Mar; 108(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 17616811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How mammographic breast density affects radiologists' visual search patterns.
    Al Mousa DS; Brennan PC; Ryan EA; Lee WB; Tan J; Mello-Thoms C
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1386-93. PubMed ID: 25172414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast image pre-processing for mammographic tissue segmentation.
    He W; Hogg P; Juette A; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Dec; 67():61-73. PubMed ID: 26498046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Training on Qualitative Mammographic Density Assessment.
    Raza S; Mackesy MM; Winkler NS; Hurwitz S; Birdwell RL
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Mar; 13(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 26944039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiologist Agreement for Mammographic Recall by Case Difficulty and Finding Type.
    Onega T; Smith M; Miglioretti DL; Carney PA; Geller BA; Kerlikowske K; Buist DS; Rosenberg RD; Smith RA; Sickles EA; Haneuse S; Anderson ML; Yankaskas B
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Nov; 13(11S):e72-e79. PubMed ID: 27814827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variability of breast density assessment in short-term reimaging with digital mammography.
    Kim WH; Moon WK; Kim SM; Yi A; Chang JM; Koo HR; Lee SH; Cho N
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):1724-30. PubMed ID: 23727379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories.
    Martin KE; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Paramagul C; Blane CE; Klein KA; Sonnad SS; Chan HP
    Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):656-65. PubMed ID: 16857974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changes in mammographic densities induced by a hormonal contraceptive designed to reduce breast cancer risk.
    Spicer DV; Ursin G; Parisky YR; Pearce JG; Shoupe D; Pike A; Pike MC
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1994 Mar; 86(6):431-6. PubMed ID: 8120917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical evaluation of a fully automated mammographic breast density algorithm.
    Abdolell M; Tsuruda K; Schaller G; Caines J
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():651091. PubMed ID: 23737861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study.
    Wolfe JN; Saftlas AF; Salane M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Jun; 148(6):1087-92. PubMed ID: 3495132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammographic densities and the prevalence and incidence of histological types of benign breast disease. Reference Pathologists of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.
    Boyd NF; Jensen HM; Cooke G; Han HL; Lockwood GA; Miller AB
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2000 Feb; 9(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 10777006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative assessment of breast density from digitized mammograms into Tabar's patterns.
    Jamal N; Ng KH; Looi LM; McLean D; Zulfiqar A; Tan SP; Liew WF; Shantini A; Ranganathan S
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5843-57. PubMed ID: 17068368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inter-observer agreement according to three methods of evaluating mammographic density and parenchymal pattern in a case control study: impact on relative risk of breast cancer.
    Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Diao P; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():274. PubMed ID: 25884160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.