These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7550086)

  • 21. Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure.
    Menini M; Setti P; Pera F; Pera P; Pesce P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr; 22(3):1253-1262. PubMed ID: 28965251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Modified indexing technique for the immediate interim restoration of a dental implant.
    Reis JM; Abi-Rached Fde O; Scardueli CR; Pinelli LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):369-72. PubMed ID: 24433838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Direct custom implant impression copings for the preservation of the pontic receptor site architecture.
    Schoenbaum TR; Han TJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Mar; 107(3):203-6. PubMed ID: 22489334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A technique for relining bar-retained overdentures.
    Mosharraf R; Abolhasani M; Givehchian P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1591-4. PubMed ID: 25156093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A technique for converting an existing denture into a cast metal-reinforced implant-retained overdenture.
    Orenstein IH; Weinstein BF; Gelman AS; Fiks S; McCartney JW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Dec; 104(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 21095403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Simple method of record base fabrication for a bar-retained implant overdenture.
    Oh WS; Park JM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):638-40. PubMed ID: 22762518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Simplified procedure for replacement of retentive clips in a bar-retained implant overdenture.
    Welsh G; Bissell V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 May; 83(5):586-8. PubMed ID: 10793394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attachment-retained overdentures: the most cost-effective implant solution for the edentulous arch.
    Strong SM
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 19552359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of Different Implant Impression Techniques: Evaluation of New Tray Design Concept.
    Liu DY; Cader FN; Abduo J; Palamara J
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e682-e687. PubMed ID: 29286181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. One-step fixed edentulous implant impressions and maxillomandibular jaw relationships: technical note.
    Dario LJ
    Implant Dent; 1996; 5(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 9151613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: an optical scanning study.
    Papaspyridakos P; Benic GI; Hogsett VL; White GS; Lal K; Gallucci GO
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jun; 23(6):676-681. PubMed ID: 21631595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of master cast technique on the cast precision of implant-retained fixed prostheses.
    Rodrigues MA; Luthi LF; Henriques GE
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(2):122-7; quiz 128-9. PubMed ID: 22414505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of impression techniques and materials for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Chávez AM; Amaral AL; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 20657873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. One clinical visit for a multiple implant restoration master cast fabrication.
    Hussaini S; Wong T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Dec; 78(6):550-3. PubMed ID: 9421782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fabrication of implant-assisted restorations utilizing functional impression techniques: case reports.
    Uludag B; Celik G; Sahin V; Ozturk O
    J Oral Implantol; 2007; 33(5):297-304. PubMed ID: 17987863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Templates as an aid in implantology].
    Meijer HJ; Batenburg RH; Wietsma AK; Reintsema H; Raghoebar GM
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1998 Jul; 105(7):238-41. PubMed ID: 11928426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical accuracy outcomes of closed-tray and open-tray implant impression techniques for partially edentulous patients.
    Gallucci GO; Papaspyridakos P; Ashy LM; Kim GE; Brady NJ; Weber HP
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(5):469-72. PubMed ID: 21909490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A novel open-tray impression technique for fabrication of a provisional prosthesis on immediate load implants in a completely edentulous arch.
    Kaneko T; Yamagishi K; Horie N; Shimoyama T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):556-62. PubMed ID: 23527360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Removable implant-retained overdentures: a case report.
    Strong SM
    Dent Today; 2009 May; 28(5):74, 76, 78-9. PubMed ID: 19485014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.