These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7551301)

  • 61. A prospective randomized comparison of defibrillation efficacy of truncated pulses and damped sine wave pulses in humans.
    Bardy GH; Zaghi H; Gartman D; Poole JE; Kudenchuk PK; Dolack GL; Johnson G; Troutman C
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1994 Sep; 5(9):725-30. PubMed ID: 7827711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Porcine defibrillation thresholds with chopped biphasic truncated exponential waveforms.
    Sullivan JL; Melnick SB; Chapman FW; Walcott GP
    Resuscitation; 2007 Aug; 74(2):325-31. PubMed ID: 17383792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. A prospective, randomized, comparison in patients between a pectoral unipolar defibrillation system and that using an additional inferior vena cava electrode.
    Favale S; Dicandia CD; Tunzi P; Rizzon P
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Aug; 22(8):1140-5. PubMed ID: 10461288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Optimal biphasic waveforms for internal defibrillation using a 60 muF capacitor.
    Yamanouchi Y; Garrigue SX; Mowrey KA; Wilkoff BL; Tchou PJ
    Exp Clin Cardiol; 2002; 7(4):188-92. PubMed ID: 19644590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Comparison of single-biphasic versus sequential-biphasic shocks on defibrillation threshold in pigs.
    Csanadi Z; Jones DL; Wood GK; Klein GJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jun; 20(6):1606-12. PubMed ID: 9227756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. A prospective randomized comparison in humans of 90-mu F and 120-mu F biphasic pulse defibrillation using a unipolar defibrillation system.
    Poole JE; Kudenchuk PJ; Dolack GL; Jones GK; Degroot P; Johnson G; Bardy GH
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1995 Dec; 6(12):1097-100. PubMed ID: 8720210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Electrode system influence on biphasic waveform defibrillation efficacy in humans.
    Bardy GH; Troutman C; Johnson G; Mehra R; Poole JE; Dolack GL; Kudenchuk PJ; Gartman DM
    Circulation; 1991 Aug; 84(2):665-71. PubMed ID: 1860210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Optimal truncation of defibrillation pulses.
    Irnich W
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jun; 18(6):673-88. PubMed ID: 7659593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Comparison of single- and dual-coil active pectoral defibrillation lead systems.
    Gold MR; Olsovsky MR; Pelini MA; Peters RW; Shorofsky SR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1998 May; 31(6):1391-4. PubMed ID: 9581739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using dual, triple, and quadruple electrode systems.
    Munsif AN; Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Matthew P; Giorgberidze I; Kaushik RR; Mehra R
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Jun; 79(12):1632-9. PubMed ID: 9202354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Combination biphasic waveform plus sequential pulse defibrillation improves defibrillation efficacy of a nonthoracotomy lead system.
    Exner D; Yee R; Jones DL; Klein GJ; Mehra R
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Feb; 23(2):317-22. PubMed ID: 8294680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Lead system optimization for transvenous defibrillation.
    Gold MR; Foster AH; Shorofsky SR
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Nov; 80(9):1163-7. PubMed ID: 9359543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Effect of electrode polarity on internal defibrillation with monophasic and biphasic waveforms using an endocardial lead system.
    Huang J; KenKnight BH; Walcott GP; Walker RG; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Feb; 8(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 9048247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Evaluation of shock waveform configuration on the defibrillation capacity of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in dogs.
    Pariaut R; Saelinger C; Vila J; Deforge W; Queiroz-Williams P; Beaufrère H; Zimmerman M; Saile K; Reynolds CA
    J Vet Cardiol; 2012 Sep; 14(3):389-98. PubMed ID: 22819488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Automated external defibrillators: design considerations.
    Kroll MW; Brewer JE
    New Horiz; 1997 May; 5(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 9153042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. The subcutaneous array: a new lead adjunct for the transvenous ICD to lower defibrillation thresholds.
    Higgins SL; Alexander DC; Kuypers CJ; Brewster SA
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Aug; 18(8):1540-8. PubMed ID: 7479175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Prospective, randomized comparison in humans of a unipolar defibrillation system with that using an additional superior vena cava electrode.
    Bardy GH; Dolack GL; Kudenchuk PJ; Poole JE; Mehra R; Johnson G
    Circulation; 1994 Mar; 89(3):1090-3. PubMed ID: 8124794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Comparison of defibrillation efficacy using implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with single- or dual-coil defibrillation leads and active can.
    Lubiński A; Lewicka-Nowak E; Zienciuk A; Królak T; Kempa M; Pazdyga A; Raczak G; Swiatecka G
    Kardiol Pol; 2005 Sep; 63(3):234-41; discussion 242-3. PubMed ID: 16180177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Comparison of the internal defibrillation thresholds for monophasic and double and single capacitor biphasic waveforms.
    Kavanagh KM; Tang AS; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1989 Nov; 14(5):1343-9. PubMed ID: 2808992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Optimal truncation of defibrillation pulses.
    Irnich W
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Apr; 18(4 Pt 1):673-88. PubMed ID: 7596851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.