These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7551306)

  • 1. The effect of cardiac compression on defibrillation efficacy and the upper limit of vulnerability.
    Idriss SF; Anstadt MP; Anstadt GL; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1995 May; 6(5):368-78. PubMed ID: 7551306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of transvenous electrode polarity and waveform duration on the relationship between defibrillation threshold and upper limit of vulnerability.
    Huang J; KenKnight BH; Walcott GP; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1997 Aug; 96(4):1351-9. PubMed ID: 9286969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation probability of success curves using a nonthoracotomy lead system.
    Souza JJ; Malkin RA; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1995 Feb; 91(4):1247-52. PubMed ID: 7850965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of biphasic shock duration on defibrillation threshold with different electrode configurations and phase 2 capacitances: prediction by upper-limit-of-vulnerability determination.
    Schauerte PN; Ziegert K; Waldmann M; Schöndube FA; Birkenhauer F; Mischke K; Grossmann M; Hanrath P; Stellbrink C
    Circulation; 1999 Mar; 99(11):1516-22. PubMed ID: 10086978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation of acute and chronic defibrillation threshold with upper limit of vulnerability determined in normal sinus rhythm.
    Birgersdotter-Green U; Undesser K; Fujimura O; Feld GK; Kass RM; Mandel WJ; Peter CT; Chen PS
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Jul; 3(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 10387143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Myocardial vulnerability to T wave shocks: relation to shock strength, shock coupling interval, and dispersion of ventricular repolarization.
    Fabritz CL; Kirchhof PF; Behrens S; Zabel M; Franz MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1996 Mar; 7(3):231-42. PubMed ID: 8867297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of shock waveform on relationship between upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation threshold.
    Swerdlow CD; Kass RM; O'Connor ME; Chen PS
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Apr; 9(4):339-49. PubMed ID: 9581950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The zone of vulnerability to T wave shocks in humans.
    Swerdlow CD; Martin DJ; Kass RM; Davie S; Mandel WJ; Gang ES; Chen PS
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Feb; 8(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 9147699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological effects of monophasic and biphasic stimuli in normal and infarcted dogs.
    Wharton JM; Richard VJ; Murry CE; Dixon EG; Reimer KA; Meador J; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Sep; 13(9):1158-72. PubMed ID: 1700392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of rapid pacing and T-wave scanning on the relation between the defibrillation and upper-limit-of-vulnerability dose-response curves.
    Malkin RA; Idriss SF; Walker RG; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1995 Sep; 92(5):1291-9. PubMed ID: 7648678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of electrode polarity on internal defibrillation with monophasic and biphasic waveforms using an endocardial lead system.
    Huang J; KenKnight BH; Walcott GP; Walker RG; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Feb; 8(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 9048247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Immediate reproducibility of upper limit of vulnerability measurements in patients undergoing transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation.
    Ellenbogen KA; Wood MA; Gilligan DM; Crofts T; London W; McClish D
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Jun; 9(6):588-95. PubMed ID: 9654223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of pulse separation between two sequential biphasic shocks given over different lead configurations on ventricular defibrillation efficacy.
    Johnson EE; Alferness CA; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1992 Jun; 85(6):2267-74. PubMed ID: 1591840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of pacing site on ventricular fibrillation initiation by shocks during the vulnerable period.
    Idriss SF; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Am J Physiol; 1999 Nov; 277(5):H2065-82. PubMed ID: 10564163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Epicardial sock mapping following monophasic and biphasic shocks of equal voltage with an endocardial lead system.
    Usui M; Callihan RL; Walker RG; Walcott GP; Rollins DL; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1996 Apr; 7(4):322-34. PubMed ID: 8777480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in sheep.
    Cooper RA; Alferness CA; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1993 May; 87(5):1673-86. PubMed ID: 8491023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Timing of the upper limit of vulnerability is different for monophasic and biphasic shocks: implications for the determination of the defibrillation threshold.
    Behrens S; Li C; Franz MR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2179-87. PubMed ID: 9309741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Upper limit of vulnerability predicts chronic defibrillation threshold for transvenous implantable defibrillators.
    Martin DJ; Chen PS; Hwang C; Gang ES; Mandel WJ; Peter CT; Swerdlow CD
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Mar; 8(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 9083873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Left ventricular apex ablation decreases the upper limit of vulnerability.
    Chattipakorn N; Fotuhi PC; Zheng X; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 2000 May; 101(21):2458-60. PubMed ID: 10831517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cilostazol attenuates ventricular arrhythmia induction and improves defibrillation efficacy in swine.
    Kanlop N; Shinlapawittayatorn K; Sungnoon R; Weerateerangkul P; Chattipakorn S; Chattipakorn N
    Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 2010 Apr; 88(4):422-8. PubMed ID: 20555410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.