These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7551306)
41. Influence of epicardial patches on defibrillation threshold with nonthoracotomy lead configurations. Fotuhi PC; Ideker RE; Idriss SF; Callihan RL; Walker RG; Alt EU Circulation; 1995 Nov; 92(10):3082-8. PubMed ID: 7586279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Effects of garlic on the induction of ventricular fibrillation. Sungnoon R; Kanlop N; Chattipakorn SC; Tawan R; Chattipakorn N Nutrition; 2008; 24(7-8):711-6. PubMed ID: 18456459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using dual, triple, and quadruple electrode systems. Munsif AN; Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Matthew P; Giorgberidze I; Kaushik RR; Mehra R Am J Cardiol; 1997 Jun; 79(12):1632-9. PubMed ID: 9202354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Effects of polarity for monophasic and biphasic shocks on defibrillation efficacy with an endocardial system. Usui M; Walcott GP; Strickberger SA; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Jan; 19(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 8848379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The effects of ventricular fibrillation duration and site of initiation on the defibrillation threshold during early ventricular fibrillation. Strobel JS; Kenknight BH; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE J Am Coll Cardiol; 1998 Aug; 32(2):521-7. PubMed ID: 9708486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Effects of lidocaine on relation between defibrillation threshold and upper limit of vulnerability in open-chest dogs. Topham SL; Cha YM; Peters BB; Chen PS Circulation; 1992 Mar; 85(3):1146-51. PubMed ID: 1537112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Upper limit of vulnerability is a good estimator of shock strength associated with 90% probability of successful defibrillation in humans with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Swerdlow CD; Ahern T; Kass RM; Davie S; Mandel WJ; Chen PS J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 27(5):1112-8. PubMed ID: 8609329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Relation of atrial refractoriness to upper and lower limits of vulnerability for atrial fibrillation/flutter following implantable ventricular defibrillator shocks. Katz A; Sweeney RJ; Gill RM; Reid PR; Prystowsky EN Circulation; 1999 Sep; 100(10):1125-30. PubMed ID: 10477539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Defibrillation efficacy with endocardial electrodes is influenced by reductions in cardiac preload. Strobel JS; Kay GN; Walcott GP; Smith WM; Ideker RE J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 1(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 9869957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effects of the pacing site, procainamide, and lead configuration on the relationship between the upper limit of vulnerability and the defibrillation threshold. Fan W; Gotoh M; Chen PS Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jun; 18(6):1279-84. PubMed ID: 7659583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Cardiac potential and potential gradient fields generated by single, combined, and sequential shocks during ventricular defibrillation. Wharton JM; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Chen PS; Frazier DW; Yabe S; Danieley N; Ideker RE Circulation; 1992 Apr; 85(4):1510-23. PubMed ID: 1555291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Biphasic waveform external defibrillation thresholds for spontaneous ventricular fibrillation secondary to acute ischemia. Walcott GP; Killingsworth CR; Smith WM; Ideker RE J Am Coll Cardiol; 2002 Jan; 39(2):359-65. PubMed ID: 11788232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Progressive depolarization: a unified hypothesis for defibrillation and fibrillation induction by shocks. Dillon SM; Kwaku KF J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 May; 9(5):529-52. PubMed ID: 9607463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A comparison of biventricular and conventional transvenous defibrillation: a computational study using patient derived models. Mocanu D; Kettenbach J; Sweeney MO; Kikinis R; Kenknight BH; Eisenberg SR Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 May; 27(5):586-93. PubMed ID: 15125713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Biphasic versus sequential pulse defibrillation: a direct comparison in pigs. Jones DL; Klein GJ; Wood GK Am Heart J; 1992 Jul; 124(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 1615834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Potential benefit of transesophageal defibrillation: an experimental evaluation. Mischke K; Schimpf T; Knackstedt C; Zarse M; Eickholt C; Plisiene J; Frechen D; Gramley F; Schauerte P Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Jul; 24(4):418-22. PubMed ID: 16787798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Combination biphasic waveform plus sequential pulse defibrillation improves defibrillation efficacy of a nonthoracotomy lead system. Exner D; Yee R; Jones DL; Klein GJ; Mehra R J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Feb; 23(2):317-22. PubMed ID: 8294680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison of single-biphasic versus sequential-biphasic shocks on defibrillation threshold in pigs. Csanadi Z; Jones DL; Wood GK; Klein GJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jun; 20(6):1606-12. PubMed ID: 9227756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of ventricular vulnerability. Chen PS; Shibata N; Dixon EG; Martin RO; Ideker RE Circulation; 1986 May; 73(5):1022-8. PubMed ID: 3698224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]