These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Disposable and reusable trocars. Watson DI Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):140-2. PubMed ID: 7552131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single-patient-use laparoscopic instrumentation: a company perspective. Straface S Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):135-9. PubMed ID: 7552130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Durability and function of disposable versus reusable laparoscopic instrumentation. Bessell JR; Patkin M; Isabel L Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):143-6. PubMed ID: 7552132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reprocessing of reusable medical devices. Malchesky PS; Chamberlain VC; Scott-Conner C; Salis B; Wallace C ASAIO J; 1995; 41(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 7640417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of costs for reusable and disposable syringes. Yimyam S; Srisuphan W; Plianpadung S; Senaratana W J Med Assoc Thai; 1995 Jul; 78 Suppl 1():S26-8. PubMed ID: 7666023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness and safety of reusable tracheal suction tubes. Nanta P; Senarat W; Tribuddharat C; Danchaivijitr S J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Dec; 88 Suppl 10():S86-8. PubMed ID: 16850647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ["Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic surgery--a controlled study"]. Engert K Zentralbl Chir; 1995; 120(5):416. PubMed ID: 7610732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps. A prospective cost analysis in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of the Dijon University Hospital]. Lejeune C; Prost P; Michiels C; Roullaud-Guenfoudi MP; Phelip JM; Martin L; Rassiat E; Faivre J Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2001; 25(6-7):669-73. PubMed ID: 11673734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single-use versus reusable laparoscopic surgical instruments: a comparative cost analysis. Schaer GN; Koechli OR; Haller U Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Dec; 173(6):1812-5. PubMed ID: 8610767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Economic impact of laparoscopic instrumentation: a company perspective. Swem T; Fazzalari R Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):129-32. PubMed ID: 7552128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Disposable vs reusable laryngeal mask airway: a cost-minimization analysis]. Soulias M; Martin L; Garnier N; Juniot A; Aho LS; Freysz M Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2006 Aug; 25(8):811-4. PubMed ID: 16603333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing the cost of reusable and disposable packs. MacLean C Mater Manag Health Care; 1994 Feb; 3(2):24-6, 28. PubMed ID: 10131599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective comparison of the costs of reusable and limited-reuse laparoscopic instruments. DesCĂ´teaux JG; Blackmore K; Parsons L Can J Surg; 1998 Apr; 41(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9575997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Re-sterilization of disposable products: a gamble]. Haindl H Pflege Z; 2002 Feb; 55(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 12640997 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic surgery--a controlled study]. Paolucci V; Schaeff B; Gutt C; Morawe G; Encke A Zentralbl Chir; 1995; 120(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 7887039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A cost analysis of reusable and disposable flexible optical scopes for intubation. Tvede MF; Kristensen MS; Nyhus-Andreasen M Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 May; 56(5):577-84. PubMed ID: 22338623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A close-up look at laparoscopic instrument costs. Mater Manag Health Care; 1993 Nov; 2(11):28-32. PubMed ID: 10171719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]