285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7552131)
1. Disposable and reusable trocars.
Watson DI
Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):140-2. PubMed ID: 7552131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Durability and function of disposable versus reusable laparoscopic instrumentation.
Bessell JR; Patkin M; Isabel L
Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):143-6. PubMed ID: 7552132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The valve design of disposable and reusable trocars.
O'Rourke NA
Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995 Feb; 3(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 7757439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reusable, re-posable and disposable instrumentation.
Melzer A; Buess G
Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):127-8. PubMed ID: 7552127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Single-patient-use laparoscopic instrumentation: a company perspective.
Straface S
Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):135-9. PubMed ID: 7552130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Disposable versus reusable instrumentation.
Maddern GJ; Bessell JR
Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):125-6. PubMed ID: 7552126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of a disposable trocar for insertion of contraceptive implants.
Steiner MJ; Boler T; Obhai G; Hubacher D
Contraception; 2010 Feb; 81(2):140-2. PubMed ID: 20103452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic surgery--a controlled study].
Paolucci V; Schaeff B; Gutt C; Morawe G; Encke A
Zentralbl Chir; 1995; 120(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 7887039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ["Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic surgery--a controlled study"].
Engert K
Zentralbl Chir; 1995; 120(5):416. PubMed ID: 7610732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reprocessing of reusable medical devices.
Malchesky PS; Chamberlain VC; Scott-Conner C; Salis B; Wallace C
ASAIO J; 1995; 41(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 7640417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A close-up look at laparoscopic instrument costs.
Mater Manag Health Care; 1993 Nov; 2(11):28-32. PubMed ID: 10171719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic review of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instruments: costs and safety.
Siu J; Hill AG; MacCormick AD
ANZ J Surg; 2017 Jan; 87(1-2):28-33. PubMed ID: 27878921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Adler S; Scherrer M; Rückauer KD; Daschner FD
Surg Endosc; 2005 Feb; 19(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 15580444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective comparison of the costs of reusable and limited-reuse laparoscopic instruments.
DesCôteaux JG; Blackmore K; Parsons L
Can J Surg; 1998 Apr; 41(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9575997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty: disposable and reusable instruments.
Lau H
Surg Technol Int; 2006; 15():109-15. PubMed ID: 17029170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reusable instruments are more cost-effective than disposable instruments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Apelgren KN; Blank ML; Slomski CA; Hadjis NS
Surg Endosc; 1994 Jan; 8(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 8153862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single-use versus reusable laparoscopic surgical instruments: a comparative cost analysis.
Schaer GN; Koechli OR; Haller U
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Dec; 173(6):1812-5. PubMed ID: 8610767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trocars: safety and selection. Emergency Care Research Institute.
Health Devices; 1998 Nov; 27(11):376-99. PubMed ID: 9859030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The evolving design of laparoscopic instruments.
Stenning GG
Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):133-4. PubMed ID: 7552129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Economic impact of laparoscopic instrumentation: a company perspective.
Swem T; Fazzalari R
Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):129-32. PubMed ID: 7552128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
