116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7552852)
1. Sens-A-Ray characteristics with variations in beam quality.
Harada T; Nishikawa K; Shibuya H; Hayakawa Y; Kuroyanagi K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jul; 80(1):120-3. PubMed ID: 7552852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensitometric response of the Sens-A-Ray, a charge-coupled imaging device, to changes in beam energy.
Goshima T; Goshima Y; Scarfe WC; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jan; 25(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 9084280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of beam energy and filtration on the signal-to-noise ratio of the Dexis intraoral X-ray detector.
Kitagawa H; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 15140818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dependency of dose response of five charge-coupled device-based digital intra-oral radiographic systems on tube voltage.
Nishikawa K; Shibuya H; Wakoh M; Kuroyanagi K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Nov; 28(6):364-7. PubMed ID: 10578191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Absolute measures of image quality for the Sens-A-Ray direct digital intraoral radiography system.
Welander U; McDavid WD; Mörner AC; Tronje G; Tokuoka O; Fuchihata H; Nelvig P; Dove SB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Sep; 80(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 7489279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of radiographic techniques (kVp and mAs) on image quality and patient doses in digital subtraction angiography.
Gkanatsios NA; Huda W; Peters KR
Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1643-50. PubMed ID: 12201409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system.
Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Dance DR
Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensor noise in direct digital imaging (the RadioVisioGraphy, Sens-a-Ray, and Visualix/Vixa systems) evaluated by subtraction radiography.
Wenzel A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jan; 77(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 8108102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
Borg E
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
Farman TT; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
Gen Dent; 1996; 44(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 9515395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Precise image-receptor calibration and monitoring of beam quality with a step wedge.
Couture RA; Hildebolt CF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 11803390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultra-high pitch chest computed tomography at 70 kVp tube voltage in an anthropomorphic pediatric phantom and non-sedated pediatric patients: Initial experience with 3
Hagelstein C; Henzler T; Haubenreisser H; Meyer M; Sudarski S; Schoenberg SO; Neff KW; Weis M
Z Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 26(4):349-361. PubMed ID: 26702762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Resolution as defined by line spread and modulation transfer functions for four digital intraoral radiographic systems.
Welander U; McDavid WD; Sanderink GC; Tronje G; Mörner AC; Dove SB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jul; 78(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 8078652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Basic technical properties of a system for direct acquisition of digital intraoral radiographs.
Welander U; Nelvig P; Tronje G; McDavid WD; Dove SB; Mörner AC; Cederlund T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Apr; 75(4):506-16. PubMed ID: 8464618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The importance of spectral separation: an assessment of dual-energy spectral separation for quantitative ability and dose efficiency.
Krauss B; Grant KL; Schmidt BT; Flohr TG
Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 25373305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An evaluation of the Sens-A-Ray digital dental imaging system.
McDonnell D; Price C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 8299829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detector for dual-energy digital radiography.
Barnes GT; Sones RA; Tesic MM; Morgan DR; Sanders JN
Radiology; 1985 Aug; 156(2):537-40. PubMed ID: 4011921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantification of the effect of system and object parameters on edge enhancement in phase-contrast radiography.
Donnelly EF; Price RR; Pickens DR
Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2888-96. PubMed ID: 14655935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the performance of intraoral X-ray sensors using objective image quality assessment.
Hellén-Halme K; Johansson C; Nilsson M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 May; 121(5):e129-37. PubMed ID: 27068317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Circle of Willis at CT angiography: dose reduction and image quality--reducing tube voltage and increasing tube current settings.
Waaijer A; Prokop M; Velthuis BK; Bakker CJ; de Kort GA; van Leeuwen MS
Radiology; 2007 Mar; 242(3):832-9. PubMed ID: 17229873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
