These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7552852)

  • 21. Direct digital dental x-ray imaging with visualix/VIXA.
    Molteni R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Aug; 76(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 8361738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Automated tube voltage selection in thoracoabdominal computed tomography at high pitch using a third-generation dual-source scanner: image quality and radiation dose performance.
    Lurz M; Lell MM; Wuest W; Eller A; Scharf M; Uder M; May MS
    Invest Radiol; 2015 May; 50(5):352-60. PubMed ID: 25591129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Image quality of direct digital intraoral x-ray sensors in assessing root canal length. The RadioVisioGraphy, Visualix/VIXA, Sens-A-Ray, and Flash Dent systems compared with Ektaspeed films.
    Sanderink GC; Huiskens R; van der Stelt PF; Welander US; Stheeman SE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jul; 78(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 8078654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Correction of background noise in direct digital dental radiography.
    Yoshioka T; Kobayashi C; Suda H; Sasaki T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Nov; 25(5):256-62. PubMed ID: 9161179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The relationship between pixel value and beam quality in photostimulable phosphor imaging.
    Tucker DM; Rezentes PS
    Med Phys; 1997 Jun; 24(6):887-93. PubMed ID: 9198024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The impact of increased Al filtration on x-ray tube loading and image quality in diagnostic radiology.
    Behrman RH
    Med Phys; 2003 Jan; 30(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 12557981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Scout view X-ray attenuation versus weight-based selection of reduced peak tube voltage in cardiac CT angiography.
    Ghafourian K; Younes D; Simprini LA; Weigold WG; Weissman G; Taylor AJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jun; 5(6):589-95. PubMed ID: 22698527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape.
    Siegel MJ; Schmidt B; Bradley D; Suess C; Hildebolt C
    Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):515-22. PubMed ID: 15358847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Body size and tube voltage-dependent guiding equations for optimal selection of image acquisition parameters in clinical X-ray imaging.
    Zheng X
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2018 Jun; 11(2):212-218. PubMed ID: 29667102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sens-A-Ray. A new system for direct digital intraoral radiography.
    Nelvig P; Wing K; Welander U
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Dec; 74(6):818-23. PubMed ID: 1488241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Photon counting spectral CT: improved material decomposition with K-edge-filtered x-rays.
    Shikhaliev PM
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Mar; 57(6):1595-615. PubMed ID: 22398007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Computed Tomography Angiography of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts: Low Contrast Media Volume Protocols Adapted to Tube Voltage.
    Higashigaito K; Husarik DB; Barthelmes J; Plass AR; Manka R; Maisano F; Alkadhi H
    Invest Radiol; 2016 Apr; 51(4):241-8. PubMed ID: 26646307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Automatic exposure control in multichannel CT with tube current modulation to achieve a constant level of image noise: experimental assessment on pediatric phantoms.
    Brisse HJ; Madec L; Gaboriaud G; Lemoine T; Savignoni A; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):3018-33. PubMed ID: 17822010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Relating noise to image quality indicators in CT examinations with tube current modulation.
    Solomon JB; Li X; Samei E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):592-600. PubMed ID: 23436849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of Z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique with fixed tube current CT scanning of abdomen and pelvis.
    Kalra MK; Maher MM; Toth TL; Kamath RS; Halpern EF; Saini S
    Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 15286306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical study of the sensitivity and dynamic range of three digital systems, E-speed film and digitized film.
    Bóscolo FN; Oliveira AE; Almeida SM; Haiter CF; Haiter Neto F
    Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(3):191-5. PubMed ID: 11696917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of automatic tube voltage selection on image quality and radiation dose in abdominal CT angiography of various body sizes: a phantom study.
    Schindera ST; Winklehner A; Alkadhi H; Goetti R; Fischer M; Gnannt R; Szucs-Farkas Z
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Feb; 68(2):e79-86. PubMed ID: 23219454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optimal setting of automatic exposure control based on image noise and contrast on iodine-enhanced CT.
    Murazaki H; Funama Y; Sugaya Y; Miyazaki O; Tomiguchi S; Awai K
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Apr; 19(4):478-84. PubMed ID: 22222026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.