138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7552890)
1. Niobium filtration of conventional and high-frequency x-ray generator beams for intraoral radiography. Effects on absorbed doses, image density and contrast, and photon spectra.
Tetradis S; Scaf G; Lurie AG; Freedman ML
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Aug; 80(2):232-41. PubMed ID: 7552890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Niobi-X filtration in intraoral radiology.
White SC; Gratt BM
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Dec; 72(6):746-55. PubMed ID: 1812457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of aluminum-copper alloy filtration on photon spectra, air kerma rate and image contrast.
Gonçalves A; Rollo JM; Gonçalves M; Haiter Neto F; Bóscolo FN
Braz Dent J; 2004; 15(3):214-9. PubMed ID: 15798826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of niobium filtration and constant potential on image quality in dental radiography. 1: Subjective assessment and contrast.
McDonnell D; Price C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Nov; 20(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 1808011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of thin K-edge filters on the image quality of D- and E-speed dental film.
MacDonald-Jankowski DS; Lawinski CP; Payne M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 8593903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of niobium filtration and constant potential on the sensitometric responses of dental radiographic films.
Price C; McDonnell D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Feb; 20(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 1884846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Are additional filters made of niobium superior to the copper filter in dental radiology?].
Cordt I; Engelke W
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1990; 100(10):1160-3. PubMed ID: 2237349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of niobium filtration and constant potential on the attenuation of dental X-ray beams by water.
McDonnell D; Price C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 May; 20(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 1936421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tissue radiation dosages using the RVG-S with and without niobium filtration.
Scarfe WC; Farman AG; Brand JW; Kelly MS
Aust Dent J; 1997 Oct; 42(5):335-42. PubMed ID: 9409051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic image quality and dose reduction using niobium filtration for cephalometric radiography.
Wakoh M; Farman AG; Kelly MS; Kuroyanagi K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Nov; 22(4):189-94. PubMed ID: 8181645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Direct digital imaging with and without niobium filtration for detection of density differences beneath steel orthodontic bands.
Borden DR; Farman AG; Yancey J; Kelley MS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Aug; 23(3):135-7. PubMed ID: 7835513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Niobium filtration in dental radiology. Effects on image quality and on dosage].
Bianchi SD; Giovannetti P; Albrito F
Radiol Med; 1997 Jun; 93(6):681-5. PubMed ID: 9411513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of additional filtration on image quality in dental radiography: comparison of niobium with aluminium.
McDonnell D; Price C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 1397460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors affecting x-ray spectra.
Nickoloff EL; Berman HL
Radiographics; 1993 Nov; 13(6):1337-48. PubMed ID: 8290728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Absorbed dose in AgBr in direct film for photon energies ( < 150 keV): relation to optical density. Theoretical calculation and experimental evaluation.
Helmrot E; Alm Carlsson G
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 402():1-50. PubMed ID: 8677807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitometric response of the Sens-A-Ray, a charge-coupled imaging device, to changes in beam energy.
Goshima T; Goshima Y; Scarfe WC; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jan; 25(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 9084280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of niobium filtration and constant potential on image quality in dental radiography. 2. Objective assessment.
Price C; McDonnell D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Feb; 21(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 1397453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of contrast equalization on energy imparted to the patient: a comparison of two dental generators and two types of intraoral film.
Helmrot E; Carlsson GA; Eckerdal O
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 May; 23(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 7835508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image quality assessment and radiation doses in intraoral radiography.
Yakoumakis EN; Tierris CE; Stefanou EP; Phanourakis IG; Proukakis CC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 11250637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative assessment of image quality using niobium filtration for cephalometric radiography.
Wakoh M; Farman AG; Nishikawa K; Kuroyangi K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 May; 23(2):73-5. PubMed ID: 7835506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
