These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 755459)

  • 1. [The influence of similarity in the naming of Stroop items].
    Effler M
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1978; 131(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 755459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two forms of the Stroop test.
    Taylor A; Clive PB
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Dec; 57(3 Pt 1):879-82. PubMed ID: 6664771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Test-retest reliability of standard and emotional stroop tasks: an investigation of color-word and picture-word versions.
    Strauss GP; Allen DN; Jorgensen ML; Cramer SL
    Assessment; 2005 Sep; 12(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 16123253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Concurrent validity of a children's version of the Stroop Color-Word Test: the Fruit Distraction Test.
    Cammock T; Cairns E
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Oct; 49(2):611-6. PubMed ID: 514782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reversal of Stroop test: interference in word reading.
    Nealis PM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Apr; 38(2):379-82. PubMed ID: 4824061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decrease in Stroop effect by reducing semantic interference.
    Liu AY
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Aug; 37(1):263-5. PubMed ID: 4728014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selective processing of linguistic and pictorial food stimuli in females with anorexia and bulimia nervosa.
    Stormark KM; Torkildsen Ø
    Eat Behav; 2004 Jan; 5(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 15000951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stroop interference in the left and right visual fields.
    Tsao Y; Feustel T; Soseos C
    Brain Lang; 1979 Nov; 8(3):367-71. PubMed ID: 509204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Verbal coding and the elimination of Stroop interference in a matching task.
    Mascolo MF; Hirtle SC
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(2):195-215. PubMed ID: 2349976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition.
    Simpson GB
    Psychol Bull; 1984 Sep; 96(2):316-40. PubMed ID: 6385046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A rational look at the emotional stroop phenomenon: a generic slowdown, not a stroop effect.
    Algom D; Chajut E; Lev S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Sep; 133(3):323-38. PubMed ID: 15355142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acquisition of rapid reading responses.
    Doehring DG
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 1976; 41(2):1-54. PubMed ID: 1004512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli.
    Kahneman D; Chajczyk D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Aug; 9(4):497-509. PubMed ID: 6224888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Covert processing of visual form in the absence of area LO.
    Kentridge RW; Heywood CA; Milner AD
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1488-95. PubMed ID: 15246286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Language and orthography as irrelevant features in colour-word and picture-word Stroop interference.
    Smith MC; Kirsner K
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1982 Feb; 34(Pt 1):153-70. PubMed ID: 7201654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Spontaneous reading of aphasic patients contrary to instruction? (Stroop test)].
    Cohen R; Meier E; Schulze U
    Nervenarzt; 1983 Jun; 54(6):299-303. PubMed ID: 6877439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Crowded and sparse domains in object recognition: consequences for categorization and naming.
    Gale TM; Laws KR; Foley K
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Mar; 60(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 16377049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does item content (semantic vs figural) affect reversal errors made by black and white first graders?
    Kaufman NL; Kaufman AS
    Percept Mot Skills; 1980 Jun; 50(3 Pt 1):993-4. PubMed ID: 7402884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The dependence of semantic relatedness effects upon prime processing.
    Henik A; Friedrich FJ; Kellogg WA
    Mem Cognit; 1983 Jul; 11(4):366-73. PubMed ID: 6633255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examination stress and performance on a color-word interference test.
    Ray C
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Oct; 49(2):400-2. PubMed ID: 514758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.