81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7554622)
1. Revision total hip replacement using the S-ROM femoral component.
Chandler HP; Ayres DK; Tan RC; Anderson LC; Varma AK
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Oct; (319):130-40. PubMed ID: 7554622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Femoral reconstruction with endosteal bone allografts protected by a metallic mesh in reoperation of total hip prosthesis. 19 cases with an average follow-up of 83 months].
Migaud H; Jardin C; Fontaine C; Pierchon F; d'Herbomez O; Duquennoy A
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 9452810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip.
Gross AE; Hutchison CR; Alexeeff M; Mahomed N; Leitch K; Morsi E
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Oct; (319):151-8. PubMed ID: 7554624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented tapered femoral component.
McLaughlin JR; Lee KR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jun; 90(6):1290-6. PubMed ID: 18519323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Survivorship of uncemented proximally porous-coated femoral components.
Berry DJ; Harmsen WS; Ilstrup D; Lewallen DG; Cabanela ME
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Oct; (319):168-77. PubMed ID: 7554627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nineteen year results of THA using modular 9 mm S-ROM femoral component in patients with small femoral canals.
Drexler M; Dwyer T; Marmor M; Abolghasemian M; Chakravertty R; Chechik O; Cameron HU
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Oct; 28(9):1667-70. PubMed ID: 23618752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical and radiographic assessment of a modular cementless ingrowth femoral stem system for revision hip arthroplasty.
Walter WL; Walter WK; Zicat B
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Feb; 21(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 16520203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The S-ROM hydroxyapatite proximally-coated modular femoral stem in revision hip replacement: results of 397 hips at a minimum ten-year follow-up.
Imbuldeniya AM; Walter WK; Zicat BA; Walter WL
Bone Joint J; 2014 Jun; 96-B(6):730-6. PubMed ID: 24891571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preliminary report of impaction grafting for exchange femoral arthroplasty.
Elting JJ; Mikhail WE; Zicat BA; Hubbell JC; Lane LE; House B
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Oct; (319):159-67. PubMed ID: 7554625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Revision of the acetabular component with an uncemented Harris-Galante porous-coated prosthesis.
Tanzer M; Drucker D; Jasty M; McDonald M; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1992 Aug; 74(7):987-94. PubMed ID: 1522106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The two- to six-year results with a proximally modular noncemented total hip replacement used in hip revisions.
Cameron HU
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Jan; (298):47-53. PubMed ID: 8118994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Application progress of Sivash-range of motion femoral modular stem prosthesis in developmental dysplasia of hip and hip revision].
Zhao Z; Sun J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Sep; 26(9):1054-7. PubMed ID: 23057345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revision total hip arthroplasty using an interlocking stem with an allograft-prosthesis composite.
Uchiyama K; Moriya M; Yamamoto T; Fukushima K; Takahira N; Itoman M
Acta Orthop Belg; 2013 Aug; 79(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 24205769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High rate of fracture in the cementless modular Extrême™ (Mark I) femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty: 33 cases at more than 5 years' follow-up.
Benoist J; Lambotte JC; Polard JL; Huten D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Dec; 99(8):915-21. PubMed ID: 24211127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Revision of loose cementless femoral prostheses to larger porous coated components.
Engh CA; Culpepper WJ; Kassapidis E
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Feb; (347):168-78. PubMed ID: 9520886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
Kim YH; Oh JH; Oh SH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Nov; (320):73-84. PubMed ID: 7586845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term results of femoral revision with the Wagner Self-Locking stem.
Regis D; Sandri A; Bonetti I
Surg Technol Int; 2013 Sep; 23():243-50. PubMed ID: 24081844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved techniques of cementing. The results after a minimum of fifteen years of follow-up.
Madey SM; Callaghan JJ; Olejniczak JP; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Jan; 79(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 9010186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modular femoral stem-sleeve junction failure after primary total hip arthroplasty.
Patel A; Bliss J; Calfee RP; Froehlich J; Limbird R
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Oct; 24(7):1143.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18835691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revision hip arthroplasty using strut allografts and fully porous-coated stems.
Kim YH; Kim JS
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jun; 20(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 16124960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
