These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Differential effects of visual context on pattern discrimination by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens). Kelly DM; Cook RG J Comp Psychol; 2003 Jun; 117(2):200-8. PubMed ID: 12856790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: I. Unidimensional classification does not necessarily imply analytic processing; evidence from pigeons (Columba livia), squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), and humans (Homo sapiens). Wills AJ; Lea SE; Leaver LA; Osthaus B; Ryan CM; Suret MB; Bryant CM; Chapman SJ; Millar L J Comp Psychol; 2009 Nov; 123(4):391-405. PubMed ID: 19929108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: II. Strategic information search in humans (Homo sapiens) but not in pigeons (Columba livia). Lea SE; Wills AJ; Leaver LA; Ryan CM; Bryant CM; Millar L J Comp Psychol; 2009 Nov; 123(4):406-20. PubMed ID: 19929109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Further analysis of perception of the standard Müller-Lyer figures in pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens): effects of length of brackets. Nakamura N; Watanabe S; Fujita K J Comp Psychol; 2009 Aug; 123(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 19685970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perception of the standard and the reversed Müller-Lyer figures in pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens). Nakamura N; Fujita K; Ushitani T; Miyata H J Comp Psychol; 2006 Aug; 120(3):252-61. PubMed ID: 16893262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Discrimination of artificial categories structured by family resemblances: a comparative study in people (Homo sapiens) and pigeons (Columba livia). Makino H; Jitsumori M J Comp Psychol; 2007 Feb; 121(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 17324072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The object-line inferiority effect in pigeons. Donis FJ; Heinemann EG Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jan; 53(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 8433900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Time discrimination in Columba livia and Homo sapiens. Fetterman JG; Killeen PR J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Jan; 18(1):80-94. PubMed ID: 1578202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of distinctive parts on recognition of depth-rotated objects by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans. Spetch ML; Friedman A; Reid SL J Exp Psychol Gen; 2001 Jun; 130(2):238-55. PubMed ID: 11409102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Degree of representation of the matching concept in pigeons (Columba livia). Colombo M; Cottle A; Frost N J Comp Psychol; 2003 Sep; 117(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 14498800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rotational invariance in visual pattern recognition by pigeons and humans. Hollard VD; Delius JD Science; 1982 Nov; 218(4574):804-6. PubMed ID: 7134976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do pigeons (Columba livia) study for a test? Roberts WA; Feeney MC; McMillan N; MacPherson K; Musolino E; Petter M J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):129-42. PubMed ID: 19364222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Serial learning with a wild card by pigeons (Columba livia): effect of list length. Terrace HS; Chen S; Newman AB J Comp Psychol; 1995 Jun; 109(2):162-72. PubMed ID: 7758291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]