193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7555693)
1. Sulphate reduction and methanogenesis in the ovine rumen and porcine caecum: a comparison of two microbial ecosystems.
Ushida K; Ohashi Y; Tokura M; Miyazaki K; Kojima Y
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1995 Apr; 102(4):154-6. PubMed ID: 7555693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of the addition of fumarate on methane production by ruminal microorganisms in vitro.
Asanuma N; Iwamoto M; Hino T
J Dairy Sci; 1999 Apr; 82(4):780-7. PubMed ID: 10212465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Methane oxidation and its coupled electron-sink reactions in ruminal fluid.
Kajikawa H; Valdes C; Hillman K; Wallace RJ; J Newbold C
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2003; 36(6):354-7. PubMed ID: 12753241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Methanogens and manipulation of methane production in the rumen].
Guo YQ; Hu WL; Liu JX
Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao; 2005 Feb; 45(1):145-8. PubMed ID: 15847184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anaerobic treatment of landfill leachate by sulfate reduction.
Henry JG; Prasad D
Water Sci Technol; 2000; 41(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 11381997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Growth and activities of sulfate-reducing and methanogenic bacteria in human oral cavity.
Robichaux M; Howell M; Boopathy R
Curr Microbiol; 2003 Jul; 47(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 12783186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Competition for hydrogen between sulphate-reducing bacteria and methanogenic bacteria from the human large intestine.
Gibson GR; Cummings JH; Macfarlane GT
J Appl Bacteriol; 1988 Sep; 65(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 2852666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chemical markers for rumen methanogens and methanogenesis.
McCartney CA; Bull ID; Dewhurst RJ
Animal; 2013 Jun; 7 Suppl 2():409-17. PubMed ID: 23739482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Inhibition of methanogenesis in the rumen of sheep. I. Methanogenesis before administration of inhibitors].
Zawadzki W
Pol Arch Weter; 1986; 25(1):111-26. PubMed ID: 3448596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrasting relationships between biogeochemistry and prokaryotic diversity depth profiles along an estuarine sediment gradient.
O'Sullivan LA; Sass AM; Webster G; Fry JC; Parkes RJ; Weightman AJ
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2013 Jul; 85(1):143-57. PubMed ID: 23480711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attempts to induce reductive acetogenesis into a sheep rumen.
Immig I; Demeyer D; Fiedler D; Van Nevel C; Mbanzamihigo L
Arch Tierernahr; 1996; 49(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 8988318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interaction of microbial sulphate reduction and methanogenesis in oil sands tailings ponds.
Stasik S; Wendt-Potthoff K
Chemosphere; 2014 May; 103():59-66. PubMed ID: 24325799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interactions of microbial populations in cellulose fermentation.
Wolin MJ; Miller TL
Fed Proc; 1983 Jan; 42(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 6848372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of metabolic inhibitors to study H2 consumption by human feces: evidence for a pathway other than methanogenesis and sulfate reduction.
Strocchi A; Ellis CJ; Levitt MD
J Lab Clin Med; 1993 Feb; 121(2):320-7. PubMed ID: 8433043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changes in microbial community structure, methanogenesis and rumen fermentation in response to saponin-rich fractions from different plant materials.
Goel G; Makkar HP; Becker K
J Appl Microbiol; 2008 Sep; 105(3):770-7. PubMed ID: 18422554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Metabolic interactions in methanogenic and sulfate-reducing bioreactors.
Stams AJ; Plugge CM; de Bok FA; van Houten BH; Lens P; Dijkman H; Weijma J
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(1-2):13-20. PubMed ID: 16187442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Distinct microbial hydrogen and reductant disposal pathways explain interbreed variations in ruminant methane yield.
Li Q; Ma Z; Huo J; Zhang X; Wang R; Zhang S; Jiao J; Dong X; Janssen PH; Ungerfeld EM; Greening C; Tan Z; Wang M
ISME J; 2024 Jan; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 38365243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diverse hydrogen production and consumption pathways influence methane production in ruminants.
Greening C; Geier R; Wang C; Woods LC; Morales SE; McDonald MJ; Rushton-Green R; Morgan XC; Koike S; Leahy SC; Kelly WJ; Cann I; Attwood GT; Cook GM; Mackie RI
ISME J; 2019 Oct; 13(10):2617-2632. PubMed ID: 31243332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Occurrence of sulphate-reducing bacteria in human faeces and the relationship of dissimilatory sulphate reduction to methanogenesis in the large gut.
Gibson GR; Macfarlane GT; Cummings JH
J Appl Bacteriol; 1988 Aug; 65(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 3204069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Thermodynamic constraints on methanogenic crude oil biodegradation.
Dolfing J; Larter SR; Head IM
ISME J; 2008 Apr; 2(4):442-52. PubMed ID: 18079730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
