These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7555908)

  • 1. Interelectrode coherences from nearest-neighbor and spherical harmonic expansion computation of laplacian of scalp potential.
    Lagerlund TD; Sharbrough FW; Busacker NE; Cicora KM
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Sep; 95(3):178-88. PubMed ID: 7555908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Artifactually high coherences result from using spherical spline computation of scalp current density.
    Biggins CA; Fein G; Raz J; Amir A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991 Nov; 79(5):413-9. PubMed ID: 1718714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performances of surface Laplacian estimators: a study of simulated and real scalp potential distributions.
    Babiloni F; Babiloni C; Fattorini L; Carducci F; Onorati P; Urbano A
    Brain Topogr; 1995; 8(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 8829389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Issues and considerations for using the scalp surface Laplacian in EEG/ERP research: A tutorial review.
    Kayser J; Tenke CE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Sep; 97(3):189-209. PubMed ID: 25920962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spline Laplacian estimate of EEG potentials over a realistic magnetic resonance-constructed scalp surface model.
    Babiloni F; Babiloni C; Carducci F; Fattorini L; Onorati P; Urbano A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Apr; 98(4):363-73. PubMed ID: 8641156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surface Laplacian of scalp electrical signals and independent component analysis resolve EMG contamination of electroencephalogram.
    Fitzgibbon SP; DeLosAngeles D; Lewis TW; Powers DM; Whitham EM; Willoughby JO; Pope KJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Sep; 97(3):277-84. PubMed ID: 25455426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Current source density estimation and interpolation based on the spherical harmonic Fourier expansion.
    Pascual-Marqui RD; Gonzalez-Andino SL; Valdes-Sosa PA; Biscay-Lirio R
    Int J Neurosci; 1988 Dec; 43(3-4):237-49. PubMed ID: 3243682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial filtering and neocortical dynamics: estimates of EEG coherence.
    Srinivasan R; Nunez PL; Silberstein RB
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Jul; 45(7):814-26. PubMed ID: 9644890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dangerous phase.
    Schiff SJ
    Neuroinformatics; 2005; 3(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 16284414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hemifield-dependent N1 and event-related theta/delta oscillations: An unbiased comparison of surface Laplacian and common EEG reference choices.
    Kayser J; Tenke CE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Sep; 97(3):258-70. PubMed ID: 25562833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improved surface Laplacian estimates of cortical potential using realistic models of head geometry.
    Deng S; Winter W; Thorpe S; Srinivasan R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Nov; 59(11):2979-85. PubMed ID: 22249595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. EEG coherency. I: Statistics, reference electrode, volume conduction, Laplacians, cortical imaging, and interpretation at multiple scales.
    Nunez PL; Srinivasan R; Westdorp AF; Wijesinghe RS; Tucker DM; Silberstein RB; Cadusch PJ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1997 Nov; 103(5):499-515. PubMed ID: 9402881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surface Laplacian of central scalp electrical signals is insensitive to muscle contamination.
    Fitzgibbon SP; Lewis TW; Powers DM; Whitham EW; Willoughby JO; Pope KJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Jan; 60(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 22542648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the effect of volume conduction on EEG coherence with the effect of field spread on MEG coherence.
    Winter WR; Nunez PL; Ding J; Srinivasan R
    Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(21):3946-57. PubMed ID: 17607723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of electrode density and electrolyte spreading in dense array electroencephalographic recording.
    Greischar LL; Burghy CA; van Reekum CM; Jackson DC; Pizzagalli DA; Mueller C; Davidson RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):710-20. PubMed ID: 15036067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal fluctuations in coherence of brain waves.
    Bullock TH; McClune MC; Achimowicz JZ; Iragui-Madoz VJ; Duckrow RB; Spencer SS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1995 Dec; 92(25):11568-72. PubMed ID: 8524805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High-resolution EEG using spline generated surface Laplacians on spherical and ellipsoidal surfaces.
    Law SK; Nunez PL; Wijesinghe RS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Feb; 40(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 8319965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Referential Montage Inadequately Localizes Corticocortical Evoked Potentials in Stereoelectroencephalography.
    Dickey AS; Alwaki A; Kheder A; Willie JT; Drane DL; Pedersen NP
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2022 Jul; 39(5):412-418. PubMed ID: 33337663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Generator localization by current source density (CSD): implications of volume conduction and field closure at intracranial and scalp resolutions.
    Tenke CE; Kayser J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Dec; 123(12):2328-45. PubMed ID: 22796039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.