112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 755678)
1. The influence of concentration, exposure duration, and patch occlusivity upon rabbit primary dermal irritation indices.
Gilman MR; Evans RA; De Salva SJ
Drug Chem Toxicol; 1978; 1(4):391-400. PubMed ID: 755678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A composite model for multiple assays of skin irritation.
Cruzan G; Dalbey WE; D'Aleo CJ; Singer EJ
Toxicol Ind Health; 1986 Sep; 2(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 2947348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of using fewer rabbits to evaluate dermal irritation potential of industrial chemicals.
Derelanko MJ; Finegan CE; Dunn BJ
Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1993 Aug; 21(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 8405778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Harmonization of thresholds for primary skin irritation from results of human repeated insult patch tests and laboratory animal skin irritation tests.
Tardiff RG; Hubner RP; Graves CG
J Appl Toxicol; 2003; 23(4):279-81. PubMed ID: 12884413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dermal and ocular irritation and skin sensitization studies of fullerene C60 nanoparticles.
Ema M; Matsuda A; Kobayashi N; Naya M; Nakanishi J
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2013 Jun; 32(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 23050631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative assessment of 24-hr primary skin irritation test and human patch test data with in vitro skin irritation tests according to OECD Test Guideline 439 (for quasi-drugs in Japan).
Sugiyama M; Akita M; Alépée N; Fujishiro M; Hagino S; Handa Y; Ikeda H; Imai N; Jitsukawa S; Katoh M; Kurihara K; Kyotani D; Nomura S; Okamoto Y; Okumura H; Omori T; Sugibayashi K; Todo H; Toyoda A; Ohno Y
J Toxicol Sci; 2018; 43(12):751-768. PubMed ID: 30518713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of modified methods for determining skin irritation.
Nixon GA; Bannan EA; Gaynor TW; Johnston DH; Griffith JF
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1990 Oct; 12(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 2259754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using fewer animals to identify chemical eye hazards: revised criteria necessary to maintain equivalent hazard classification.
Haseman JK; Allen DG; Lipscomb EA; Truax JF; Stokes WS
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Oct; 61(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 21745525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of dermal and eye irritation and skin sensitization due to carbon nanotubes.
Ema M; Matsuda A; Kobayashi N; Naya M; Nakanishi J
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Dec; 61(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 21893152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acute dermal irritation, sensitization, and acute toxicity studies of a transdermal patch for prophylaxis against ({+/-}) anatoxin-a poisoning.
Banerjee S; Chattopadhyay P; Ghosh A; Pathak MP; Singh S; Veer V
Int J Toxicol; 2013 Jul; 32(4):308-13. PubMed ID: 23696561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of ocular irritancy potential from dermal irritation test results.
Williams SJ
Food Chem Toxicol; 1984 Feb; 22(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 6538165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of a proprietary rubefacient "Tiger Balm" on rabbit skin.
Guppy L; Lowes NR; Walker MJ
Food Chem Toxicol; 1982 Feb; 20(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 7200061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acute toxicity, subchronic dermal toxicity, and delayed contact sensitization evaluations of dicyclopentenyloxyethyl methacrylate in rabbits and guinea pigs.
Chan PK; Baldwin RC; Fedorowski A; O'Hara GP; Hayes AW; Smith JM; Barthel CH
J Toxicol Environ Health; 1985; 16(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 4068055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the medical devices benchmark materials in the controlled human patch testing and in the RhE in vitro skin irritation protocol.
Kandárová H; Bendova H; Letasiova S; Coleman KP; De Jong WH; Jírova D
Toxicol In Vitro; 2018 Aug; 50():433-438. PubMed ID: 29462660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of the domestic Swine as an alternative animal model for conducting dermal irritation/corrosion studies on fatty amine ethoxylates.
Rausch L; Bisinger EC; Sharma A; Rose R
Int J Toxicol; 2003; 22(4):317-23. PubMed ID: 12933326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Final report on the safety assessment of capsicum annuum extract, capsicum annuum fruit extract, capsicum annuum resin, capsicum annuum fruit powder, capsicum frutescens fruit, capsicum frutescens fruit extract, capsicum frutescens resin, and capsaicin.
Int J Toxicol; 2007; 26 Suppl 1():3-106. PubMed ID: 17365137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Bovine udder skin (BUS): testing of skin compatibility and skin protection].
Pittermann WF; Kietzmann M
ALTEX; 2006; 23(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 16688383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dermal safety assessment of Arm & Hammer laundry products formulated for sensitive skin.
Frederick DM; Vorwerk L; Gupta A; Ghassemi A
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2017 Sep; 36(3):263-272. PubMed ID: 28073339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of in vivo (Draize method) and in vitro (Corrositex assay) dermal corrosion values for selected industrial chemicals.
Stobbe JL; Drake KD; Maier KJ
Int J Toxicol; 2003; 22(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 12745991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Establishment and evaluation of immortalized human epidermal keratinocytes for an alternative skin irritation test.
Kim CW; Kim CD; Choi KC
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2017; 88(Pt 2):130-139. PubMed ID: 28827132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
