BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

754 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7557034)

  • 1. [Planar determination of the aortic valve area with transesophageal echocardiography with multiplanar probe in patients with aortic stenosis and insufficiency. Comparison with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography].
    Morelli S; De Castro S; Cartoni D; Perrone C; Beni S; Bernardo ML; Ferrante L; Giordano M
    G Ital Cardiol; 1995 Jul; 25(7):851-7. PubMed ID: 7557034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography: comparison with echocardiography.
    Malyar NM; Schlosser T; Barkhausen J; Gutersohn A; Buck T; Bartel T; Erbel R
    Cardiology; 2008; 109(2):126-34. PubMed ID: 17713328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic determination of aortic valve area in adults with aortic stenosis.
    Stoddard MF; Arce J; Liddell NE; Peters G; Dillon S; Kupersmith J
    Am Heart J; 1991 Nov; 122(5):1415-22. PubMed ID: 1951006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Grading Aortic Stenosis With Mean Gradient and Aortic Valve Area: A Comparison Between Preoperative Transthoracic and Precardiopulmonary Bypass Transesophageal Echocardiography.
    Whitener G; Sivak J; Akushevich I; Samad Z; Swaminathan M
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2016 Oct; 30(5):1254-9. PubMed ID: 27495962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitation of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis with multiplane transesophageal echocardiography: comparison with monoplane transesophageal approach.
    Tribouilloy C; Shen WF; Peltier M; Mirode A; Rey JL; Lesbre JP
    Am Heart J; 1994 Sep; 128(3):526-32. PubMed ID: 8074015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography.
    Pouleur AC; le Polain de Waroux JB; Pasquet A; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
    Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 17630357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of ejection fraction and valvular regurgitation on the accuracy of aortic valve area determination.
    Berglund H; Kim CJ; Nishioka T; Luo H; Siegel RJ
    Echocardiography; 2001 Jan; 18(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 11182785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of left ventricular outflow geometry and aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by 2-dimensional versus 3-dimensional echocardiography.
    Saitoh T; Shiota M; Izumo M; Gurudevan SV; Tolstrup K; Siegel RJ; Shiota T
    Am J Cardiol; 2012 Jun; 109(11):1626-31. PubMed ID: 22440128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantification of aortic valve stenosis: head-to-head comparison of 64-slice spiral computed tomography with transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac catheterization.
    Lembcke A; Kivelitz DE; Borges AC; Lachnitt A; Hein PA; Dohmen PM; Thiele H
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jan; 44(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 19060789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of accuracy of aortic valve area assessment in aortic stenosis by real time three-dimensional echocardiography in biplane mode versus two-dimensional transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography.
    Blot-Souletie N; Hébrard A; Acar P; Carrié D; Puel J
    Echocardiography; 2007 Nov; 24(10):1065-72. PubMed ID: 18001360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Absolute assessment of aortic valve stenosis by planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, and cardiac catheterisation.
    Reant P; Lederlin M; Lafitte S; Serri K; Montaudon M; Corneloup O; Roudaut R; Laurent F
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Aug; 59(2):276-83. PubMed ID: 16873006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantification of aortic valve area: comparison of different methods of echocardiography with 3-D scan of the excised valve.
    Shirazi S; Golmohammadi F; Tavoosi A; Salehi M; Larti F; Sardari A; Geraiely B; Rahmanian M; Saberi K; Sattarzadeh Badkoubeh R
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Feb; 37(2):529-538. PubMed ID: 33001325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-invasive and invasive evaluation of aortic valve area in 100 patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: comparison of cardiac computed tomography with ECHO (transesophageal/transthoracic) and catheter examination.
    Anger T; Bauer V; Plachtzik C; Geisler T; Gawaz MP; Oberhoff M; Höher M
    J Cardiol; 2014 Mar; 63(3):189-97. PubMed ID: 24060524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aortic stenosis: comparative evaluation of 16-detector row CT and echocardiography.
    Alkadhi H; Wildermuth S; Plass A; Bettex D; Baumert B; Leschka S; Desbiolles LM; Marincek B; Boehm T
    Radiology; 2006 Jul; 240(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 16709791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography.
    Pouleur AC; le Polain de Waroux JB; Pasquet A; Vancraeynest D; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Dec; 26(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 17968960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aortic valve stenosis planimetry by means of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in the real clinical setting: feasibility, reliability and systematic deviations.
    Saura D; de la Morena G; Flores-Blanco PJ; Oliva MJ; Caballero L; González-Carrillo J; Espinosa MD; López-Ruiz M; García-Navarro M; Valdés M
    Echocardiography; 2015 Mar; 32(3):508-15. PubMed ID: 25041359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of dual-source computed tomography for the quantification of the aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis versus transthoracic echocardiography and invasive hemodynamic assessment.
    Ropers D; Ropers U; Marwan M; Schepis T; Pflederer T; Wechsel M; Klinghammer L; Flachskampf FA; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
    Am J Cardiol; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1561-7. PubMed ID: 19932793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantification of aortic stenosis in mechanically ventilated patients using multiplane transesophageal Doppler echocardiography.
    Blumberg FC; Pfeifer M; Holmer SR; Kromer EP; Riegger GA; Elsner D
    Chest; 1998 Jul; 114(1):94-7. PubMed ID: 9674453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantification of aortic valve area at 256-slice computed tomography: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography and cardiac catheterization in subjects with high-grade aortic valve stenosis prior to percutaneous valve replacement.
    Klass O; Walker MJ; Olszewski ME; Bahner J; Feuerlein S; Hoffmann MH; Lang A
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Oct; 80(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 20832221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anatomic estimation of aortic stenosis severity vs "fusion" of data from computed tomography and Doppler echocardiography.
    Jander N; Wienecke S; Dorfs S; Ruile P; Neumann FJ; Pache G; Minners J
    Echocardiography; 2018 Jun; 35(6):777-784. PubMed ID: 29522643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.